Morphological and Mechanical Analysis of the Porous Structure of Cortical Bone

Introduction: Bone is a complex hierarchical material that can be studied at many levels. For diseases like osteoporosis, characterized by bone loss, macro-level tests like DEXA scanning can predict an increased fracture risk, but cannot detect the driving mechanism. As a porous, anisotropic material, one of the only ways to truly predict bone mechanics is to model the underlying microstructure. The complexity of the porous structure of cortical bone presents a challenge when generating computational models requiring high resolution imaging, advanced mesh generation algorithms, and powerful computational resources for finite element analysis.

Methods: Cortical bone samples were collected from the middle neck of a cadaver femur (71 year old female, no history of bone disease). The neck was separated into four quadrants: anterior, posterior, superior, and inferior then further sub-sectioned to 5 mm pieces. Microcomputed tomography scans were collected (4 µm/voxel), processed, and used to generate 3D models of the bone and of the porous network. Effective strain in each model was derived through finite element analysis using physiologic displacement boundary conditions and Young’s modulus estimation using density calibrations from hydroxyapatite phantoms. Two- and three-dimensional geometric measures were evaluated from the processed images.

Results: For all quadrants, no significant relationship was found between the threedimensional measures and the effective strain around pores in a two-dimensional cross section. Effective strain increased significantly with area, shape factor, and clustering, however, these relationships were not strong.

Discussion: Studying the microstructure of cortical bone is useful for identifying the exact location of bone growth and repair based on mechanical stimulus. Relating microstrain and bone formation is important in developing a stronger understanding of how bone adapts. This knowledge could be used to develop training protocols for those susceptible to bone loss such as postmenopausal women and astronauts.

Year	Entry
1965	Atkinson PJ. Changes in resorption spaces in femoral cortical bone with age. J Pathol Bacteriol. January 1965;89(1):173-178.
2007	Schneider P, Stauber M, Voide R, Stampanoni M, Donahue LR, Müller R. Ultrastructural properties in cortical bone vary greatly in two inbred strains of mice as assessed by synchrotron light based micro‐ and nano‐CT. J Bone Miner Res. October 2007;22(10):1557-1570.
1994	Parfitt AM. Osteonal and hemi‐osteonal remodeling: the spatial and temporal framework for signal traffic in adult human bone. J Cell Biochem. July 1994;55(3):273-286.
2002	Pistoia W, van Rietbergen B, Lochmüller E-M, Lill CA, Eckstein F, Rüegsegger P. Estimation of distal radius failure load with micro-finite element analysis models based on three-dimensional peripheral quantitative computed tomography images. Bone. June 2002;30(6):842-848.
2016	Legland D, Arganda-Carreras I, Andrey P. MorphoLibJ: integrated library and plugins for mathematical morphology with ImageJ. Bioinformatics. November 15, 2016;32(22):3532-3534.
1997	Yeni YN, Brown CU, Wang Z, Norman TL. The influence of bone morphology on fracture toughness of the human femur and tibia. Bone. November 1997;21(4):453-459.
2006	Nicolella DP, Moravits DE, Gale AM, Bonewald LF, Lankford J. Osteocyte lacunae tissue strain in cortical bone. J Biomech. 2006;39(9):1735-1743.
2017	Bakalova LP. Relating Cortical Bone Mechanics to Intracortical Pore Morphology, Distribution and Remodeling History Within the Fibula Diaphysis [Master's thesis]. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; 2017.
2000	Smit TH, Burger EH. Is BMU-coupling a strain-regulated phenomenon? a finite element analysis. J Bone Miner Res. February 2000;12(2):301-307.
2008	Budyn E, Hoc T, Jonvaux J. Fracture strength assessment and aging signs detection in human cortical bone using an X-FEM multiple scale approach. Comput Mech. September 2008;42(4):579-591.
2003	Wang X, Ni Q. Determination of cortical bone porosity and pore size distribution using a low field pulsed NMR approach. J Orthop Res. March 2003;21(2):312-319.
2008	Clarke B. Normal bone anatomy and physiology. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. November 2008;3(suppl 3):S131-S139.
2010	Doube M, Kłosowski MM, Arganda-Carreras I, Cordelières FP, Dougherty RP, Jackson JS, Schmid B, Hutchinson JR, Shefelbine SJ. BoneJ: free and extensible bone image analysis in ImageJ. Bone. December 2010;47(6):1076-1079.
1964	Gong JK, Arnold JS, Cohn SH. Composition of trabecular and cortical bone. Anat Rec. 1964;149(3):325-331.
1999	Bell KL, Loveridge N, Power J, Garrahan N, Meggitt BF, Reeve J. Regional differences in cortical porosity in the fractured femoral neck. Bone. January 1999;24(1):57-64.
1965	Kerley ER. The microscopic determination of age in human bone. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1965;23(2):149-163.
2004	Bayraktar HH, Morgan EF, Niebur GL, Morris GE, Wong EK, Keaveny TM. Comparison of the elastic and yield properties of human femoral trabecular and cortical bone tissue. J Biomech. January 2004;37(1):27-35.
2009	Holzer G, von Skrbensky G, Holzer LA, Pichl W. Hip fractures and the contribution of cortical versustrabecular bone to femoral neck strength. J Bone Miner Res. March 2009;24(3):468-474.
1990	Keller TS, Mao Z, Spengler DM. Young's modulus, bending strength, and tissue physical properties of human compact bone. J Orthop Res. 1990;8(4):592-603.
1974	Reilly DT, Burstein AH. The mechanical properties of cortical bone. J Bone Joint Surg. 1974;56A(5):1001-1022.
2001	Odgaard A. Quantification of cancellous bone architecture. In: Cowin SC, ed. Bone Mechanics Handbook. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2001:14-1–14-19.
2013	Schulte FA, Ruffoni D, Lambers FM, Christen D, Webster DJ, Kuhn G, Müller R. Local mechanical stimuli regulate bone formation and resorption in mice at the tissue level. PLoS One. April 2013;8(4):e62172.
1962	Currey JD. Stress concentrations in bone. Q J Microsc Sci. March 1962;103(1):111-133.
2014	Reznikov N, Shahar R, Weiner S. Bone hierarchical structure in three dimensions. Acta Biomater. September 2014;10(8):3815-3826.
1987	Frost HM. Bone “mass” and the “mechanostat”: a proposal. Anat Rec. September 1987;219(1):1-9.
2007	Cooper DML, Thomas CDL, Clement JG, Turinsky AL, Sensen CW, Hallgrímsson B. Age-dependent change in the 3D structure of cortical porosity at the human femoral midshaft. Bone. April 2007;40(5):957-965.
2003	Cooper DML, Turinsky AL, Sensen CW, Hallgrímsson B. Quantitative 3D analysis of the canal network in cortical bone by micro-computed tomography. Anat Rec. September 2003;274B(1):169-179.
2006	Dong XN, Guo XE. Prediction of cortical bone elastic constants by a two-level micromechanical model using a generalized self-consistent method. J Biomech Eng. June 2006;128(3):309-316.
2015	Zebaze R, Seeman E. Cortical bone: a challenging geography. J Bone Miner Res. January 2015;30(1):24-29.
2018	Kersh ME, Martelli S, Zebaze R, Seeman E, Pandy MG. Mechanical loading of the femoral neck in human locomotion. J Bone Miner Res. November 2018;33(11):1999-2006.
2010	Zebaze RMD, Ghasem-Zadeh A, Bohte A, Iuliano-Burns S, Mirams M, Price RI, Mackie EJ, Seeman E. Intracortical remodelling and porosity in the distal radius and post-mortem femurs of women: a cross-sectional study. Lancet. May 15, 2010;375(9727):1729-1736.
2016	Maggiano IS, Maggiano CM, Clement JG, Thomas CDL, Carter Y, Cooper DML. Three‐dimensional reconstruction of Haversian systems in human cortical bone using synchrotron radiation‐based micro‐CT: morphology and quantification of branching and transverse connections across age. J Anat. May 2016;228(5):719-732.
2003	Seeman E. Reduced bone formation and increased bone resorption: rational targets for the treatment of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. March 2003;14(suppl 3):S2-S8.
2014	Dong P, Haupert S, Hesse B, Langer M, Gouttenoire P-J, Bousson V, Peyrin F. 3D osteocyte lacunar morphometric properties and distributions in human femoral cortical bone using synchrotron radiation micro-CT images. Bone. March 2014;60:172-185.
1990	Currey JD. Physical characteristics affecting the tensile failure properties of compact bone. J Biomech. 1990;23(8):837-844.
2007	Olszta MJ, Cheng X, Jee SS, Kumar R, Kim Y-Y, Kaufman MJ, Douglas EP, Gower LB. Bone structure and formation: a new perspective. Mater Sci Eng R Rep. November 28, 2007;58(3-5):77-116.
2006	Seeman E, Delmas PD. Bone quality: the material and structural basis of bone strength and fragility. NEJM. May 25, 2006;354(21):2250-2261.
1999	Stein MS, Feik SA, Thomas CDL, Clement JG, Wark JD. An automated analysis of intracortical porosity in human femoral bone across age. J Bone Miner Res. April 1999;14(4):624-632.
1997	Rho J-Y, Tsui TY, Pharr GM. Elastic properties of human cortical and trabecular lamellar bone measured by nanoindentation. Biomaterials. 1997;18(20):1325-1330.
1990	Frost HM. Skeletal structural adaptations to mechanical usage (SATMU), I: redefining Wolff's law: the bone modeling problem. Anat Rec. 1990;226(4):403-413.
2013	Kersh ME, Pandy MG, Bui QM, Jones AC, Arns CH, Knackstedt MA, Seeman E, Zebaze RMD. The heterogeneity in femoral neck structure and strength. J Bone Miner Res. May 2013;28(5):1022-1028.
2012	Tjong W, Kazakia GJ, Burghardt AJ, Majumdar S. The effect of voxel size on high-resolution peripheral computed tomography measurements of trabecular and cortical bone microstructure. Med Phys. April 2012;39(4):1893-1903.
1993	McCalden RW, McGeough JA, Barker MB, Court-Brown CM. Age-related changes in the tensile properties of cortical bone: the relative importance of changes in porosity, mineralization, and microstructure. J Bone Joint Surg. 1993;75A(8):1193-1205.
2001	Cowin SC, ed. Bone Mechanics Handbook. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2001.
1966	Jowsey J. Studies of Haversian systems in man and some animals. J Anat. October 1966;100(4):857-864.

Year

Entry

1965

Atkinson PJ. Changes in resorption spaces in femoral cortical bone with age. J Pathol Bacteriol. January 1965;89(1):173-178.

2007

Schneider P, Stauber M, Voide R, Stampanoni M, Donahue LR, Müller R. Ultrastructural properties in cortical bone vary greatly in two inbred strains of mice as assessed by synchrotron light based micro‐ and nano‐CT. J Bone Miner Res. October 2007;22(10):1557-1570.

1994

Parfitt AM. Osteonal and hemi‐osteonal remodeling: the spatial and temporal framework for signal traffic in adult human bone. J Cell Biochem. July 1994;55(3):273-286.

2002

Pistoia W, van Rietbergen B, Lochmüller E-M, Lill CA, Eckstein F, Rüegsegger P. Estimation of distal radius failure load with micro-finite element analysis models based on three-dimensional peripheral quantitative computed tomography images. Bone. June 2002;30(6):842-848.

2016

Legland D, Arganda-Carreras I, Andrey P. MorphoLibJ: integrated library and plugins for mathematical morphology with ImageJ. Bioinformatics. November 15, 2016;32(22):3532-3534.