Trabecular bone remodelling simulated by a stochastic exchange of discrete bone packets from the surface

Hartmann, M. A.<sup>1,2</sup>; Dunlop, J. W. C.<sup>2</sup>; Bréchet, Y. J. M.<sup>3</sup>; Fratzl, P.<sup>2</sup>; Weinkamer, R.<sup>2</sup>

Affiliations

¹Institute of Physics, University of Leoben, Franz-Josef-Strasse 18, 8700 Leoben, Austria

²Department of Biomaterials, Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces, Science Park Golm, Potsdam 14424, Germany

³SIMAP, BP75, Grenoble INP, 38402 St Martin d‘Hères cedex, France

Abstract and keywords

Human bone is constantly renewed through life via the process of bone remodelling, in which individual packets of bone are removed by osteoclasts and replaced by osteoblasts. Remodelling is mechanically controlled, where osteocytes embedded within the bone matrix are thought to act as mechanical sensors. In this computational work, a stochastic model for bone remodelling is used in which the renewal of bone material occurs by exchange of discrete bone packets. We tested different hypotheses of how the mechanical stimulus for bone remodelling is integrated by osteocytes and sent to actor cells on the bone’s surface. A collective (summed) signal from multiple osteocytes as opposed to an individual (maximal) signal from a single osteocyte was found to lead to lower inner porosity and surface roughness of the simulated bone structure. This observation can be interpreted in that collective osteocyte signalling provides an effective surface tension to the remodelling process. Furthermore, the material heterogeneity due to remodelling was studied on a network of trabeculae. As the model is discrete, the age of individual bone packets can be monitored with time. The simulation results were compared with experimental data coming from quantitative back scattered electron imaging by transforming the information about the age of the bone packet into a mineral content. Discrepancies with experiments indicate that osteoclasts preferentially resorb low mineralized, i.e. young, bone at the bone’s surface.

Keywords: Bone remodelling; Computer simulation; Osteocyte network; Surface tension; Mineral content; Mechanobiology

Links

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.03.005

PubMed: 21616469

WoS: 000292577900007

History

Online: 2011-03-09

Cited Works (25)

Year	Entry
1994	Parfitt AM. Osteonal and hemi‐osteonal remodeling: the spatial and temporal framework for signal traffic in adult human bone. J Cell Biochem. July 1994;55(3):273-286.
1979	Parfitt AM. Quantum concept of bone remodeling and turnover: implications for the pathogenesis of osteoporosis. Calcif Tiss Int. 1979;28(1):1-5.
2002	Currey JD. Bones: Structure and Mechanics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2002.
2004	Mullender M, El Haj AJ, Yang Y, van Duin MA, Burger EH, Klein-Nulend J. Mechanotransduction of bone cells in vitro: mechanobiology of bone tissue. Med Biol Eng Comput. January 2004;42(1):14-21.
2003	Roschger P, Gupta HS, Berzlanovich A, Ittner G, Dempster DW, Fratzl P, Cosman F, Parisien M, Lindsay R, Nieves JW, Klaushofer K. Constant mineralization density distribution in cancellous human bone. Bone. March 2003;32(3):316-323.
2004	Waarsing JH, Day JS, Weinans H. An improved segmentation method for in vivo μCT imaging. J Bone Miner Res. 2004;19(10):1640-1650.
2005	Borah B, Ritman EL, Dufresne TE, Jorgensen SM, Liu S, Sacha J, Phipps RJ, Turner RT. The effect of risedronate on bone mineralization as measured by micro-computed tomography with synchrotron radiation: correlation to histomorphometric indices of turnover. Bone. July 2005;37(1):1-9.
2008	Roschger P, Paschalis EP, Fratzl P, Klaushofer K. Bone mineralization density distribution in health and disease. Bone. March 2008;42(3):456-466.
2008	Webster DJ, Morley PL, van Lenthe GH, Müller R. A novel in vivo mouse model for mechanically stimulated bone adaptation: a combined experimental and computational validation study. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. October 2008;11(5):435-441.
2007	Ruffoni D, Fratzl P, Roschger P, Klaushofer K, Weinkamer R. The bone mineralization density distribution as a fingerprint of the mineralization process. Bone. May 2007;40(5):1308-1319.
2007	Fratzl P, Weinkamer R. Nature’s hierarchical materials. Prog Mater Sci. November 2007;52(8):1263-1334.
2002	Nuzzo S, Lafage‐Proust MH, Martin‐Badosa E, Boivin G, Thomas T, Alexandre C, Peyrin F. Synchrotron radiation microtomography allows the analysis of three‐dimensional microarchitecture and degree of mineralization of human iliac crest biopsy specimens: effects of etidronate treatment. J Bone Miner Res. August 2002;17(8):1372-1382.
2005	Ruimerman R, Hilbers P, van Rietbergen B, Huiskes R. A theoretical framework for strain-related trabecular bone maintenance and adaptation. J Biomech. April 2005;38(4):931-941.
2010	Chen J-H, Liu C, You L, Simmons CA. Boning up on Wolff's Law: mechanical regulation of the cells that make and maintain bone. J Biomech. January 5, 2010;43(1):108-118.
2007	Taylor D, Hazenberg JG, Lee TC. Living with cracks: damage and repair in human bone. Nat Mater. April 2007;6(4):263-268.
1986	Eriksen EF. Normal and pathological remodeling of human trabecular bone: three dimensional reconstruction of the remodeling sequence in normals and in metabolic bone disease. Endocr Rev. November 1986;7(4):379-408.
2005	Gupta HS, Schratter S, Tesch W, Roschger P, Berzlanovich A, Schoeberl T, Klaushofer K, Fratzl P. Two different correlations between nanoindentation modulus and mineral content in the bone–cartilage interface. J Struct Biol. February 2005;149(2):138-148.
2007	McNamara LM, Prendergast PJ. Bone remodelling algorithms incorporating both strain and microdamage stimuli. J Biomech. 2007;40(6):1381-1391.
1999	Burger EH, Klein-Nulend J. Mechanotransduction in bone: role of the lacunocanalicular network. FASEB J. May 1999;12(9001):S101-S112.
2001	Cowin SC, Moss ML. Mechanosensory mechanisms in bone. In: Cowin SC, ed. Bone Mechanics Handbook. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2001:chap 29.
2000	Huiskes R, Ruimerman R, van Lenthe GH, Janssen JD. Effects of mechanical forces on maintenance and adaptation of form in trabecular bone. Nature. June 8, 2000;405(6787):704-706.
2004	Han Y, Cowin SC, Schaffler MB, Weinbaum S. Mechanotransduction and strain amplification in osteocyte cell processes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. November 23, 2004;101(47):16689-16694.
1997	Frost HM. On our age‐related bone loss: insights from a new paradigm. J Bone Miner Res. October 1997;12(10):1539-1546.
2006	Robling AG, Castillo AB, Turner CH. Biomechanical and molecular regulation of bone remodeling. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2006;8:455-498.
1996	van Rietbergen B, Odgaard A, Kabel J, Huiskes R. Direct mechanics assessment of elastic symmetries and properties of trabecular bone architecture. J Biomech. December 1996;29(12):1653-1657.

Cited By (3)

Year	Entry
2012	Skedros JG, Knight AN, Farnsworth RW, Bloebaum RD. Do regional modifications in tissue mineral content and microscopic mineralization heterogeneity adapt trabecular bone tracts for habitual bending? analysis in the context of trabecular architecture of deer calcanei. J Anat. March 2012;220(3):242-255.
2018	Bachmann S. Age, Sex and Treatment Related Changes of Bone Mineral Density Based on Ct Data [Master's thesis]. Vienna University of Technology; October 2018.
2023	Tits A. Attaching Soft to Hard: A Multimodal Correlative Investigation of the Tendon-Bone Interface [PhD thesis]. Liège, Belgique: Université de Liège; 2023.