Due to the sparsity of cadaver lumbar shear stiffness data, tests on functional lumbar spinal units and a complete lumbar section (T12-L5) were done in both the anterior and posterior directions. Similar tests were performed on the Hybrid III lumbar spine for comparison.
Sixteen lumber motion segments were tested quasi-statically for their viscoelastic properties in a multi-directional (5-axis) spine machine. A hydraulic testing machine was used to carry out dynamic tests including cyclic tests at several rates of deformation (0.5 - 50 mm/sec) and relaxation tests (300 sec) to determine the associated viscoelastic properties in constrained and unconstrained modes. The specimens were then loaded to sufficient displacement to cause hard or soft tissue failures.
In the quasi-static tests the shear response was linear and the anterior stiffness (155 ± 90 N/mm) was found to be higher than posterior stiffness (104 ± 38 N/mm). In the relaxation tests the load decreased to approximately 60% of its peak value after 30 seconds. Moderate non-linearity was observed in cyclic loading with shear stiffness up to 750 N/mm, depending on the loading rate. Soft tissue only failures occurred in the unconstrained tests at 1290 N (0.5 mm/sec) and 1770 N (50 mm/sec) for anterior loading. Anterior constrained testing failures involved hard tissue at 2800 N and were not rate dependent. The Hybrid III spine elicited higher initial stiffness than cadaver specimens, but was comparable at shear loads greater than 500 N. It also had considerably greater hysteresis than cadaver specimens.
|1984||Yang KH, King AI. Mechanism of facet load transmission as a hypothesis for low-back pain. Spine. September 1984;9(6):557-565.|
|1978||Lin HS, Liu YK, Adams KH. Mechanical response of the lumbar intervertebral joint under physiological (complex) loading. J Bone Joint Surg. January 1978;60A(1):41-55.|
|1976||Crowninshield RD, Pope MH. The strength and failure characteristics of rat medial collateral ligaments. J Trauma. February 1976;16(2):99-105.|
|1979||Berkson MH, Nachemson A, Schultz AB. Mechanical properties of human lumbar spine motion segments, II: responses in compression and shear; influence of gross morphology. J Biomech Eng. February 1979;101(1):53-57.|
|1959||Rigby BJ, Hirai N, Spikes JD, Eyring H. The mechanical properties of rat tail tendon. J Gen Physiol. November 1959;43(2):265-283.|
|1968||Viidik A. A rheological model for uncalcified parallel-fibred collagenous tissue. J Biomech. January 1968;1(1):3-11.|
|1977||Foster JK, Kortge JO, Wolanin MJ. Hybrid III: a biomechanically-based crash test dummy. In: Proceedings of the 21st Stapp Car Crash Conference. October 19-21, 1977; New Orleans, LA. Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers:975-1014. SAE 770938.|
|1991||Janevic J, Ashton-Miller JA, Schultz AB. Large compressive preloads decrease lumbar motion segment flexibility. J Orthop Res. March 1991;9(2):228-236.|
|1972||Markolf KL. Deformation of the thoracolumbar intervertebral joints in response to external loads: a biomechanical study using autopsy material. J Bone Joint Surg. April 1972;54A(3):511-533.|
|1998||Happee R, Kant AR, Abramoski E, Feustel J. The load path from upper legs to chest in the Hybrid III dummy: experiments and simulations. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV). May 31–June 4, 1998; Windsor, Ontario, Canada.2098-2106.|
|2003||Maki T, Asai T, Kajzer J. Development of future pedestrian protection technologies. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV). May 19-22, 2003; Nagoya, Japan.|
|2013||Pal C, Tomosaburo O, Muthukumar M, Narayanan S. Human FE model to estimate head contact time for pedestrian protection. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV). May 27-30, 2013; Seoul, South Korea.|
|2008||Belwadi A, Yang KH. Cadaveric lumbar spine responses to flexion with and without anterior shear displacement. In: Proceedings of the 2008 International IRCOBI Conference on the Biomechanics of Impact. September 17-19, 2008; Bern, Switzerland.397-410.|
|2009||Walsh J, fitzPatrick D, Tiernan J, Simms C. The effect of postural support devices on rear impact loading for wheelchair occupants in transit. In: Proceedings of the 2009 International IRCOBI Conference on the Biomechanics of Impact. September 9-11, 2009; York, UK.423-426.|
|2010||Sato F, Antona J, Ejima S, Ono K. Influence on cervical vertebral motion of the interaction between occiput and head restraint/seat based on the reconstruction of rear-end collision using finite element human model. In: Proceedings of the 2010 International IRCOBI Conference on the Biomechanics of Impact. September 15-17, 2010; Hannover, Germany.41-58.|
|1998||Demetropoulos CK, Yang KH, Grimm MJ, Khalil TB, King AI. Mechanical properties of the cadaveric and Hybrid III lumbar spines. In: Proceedings of the 42nd Stapp Car Crash Conference. November 2-4, 1998; Tempa, AZ. Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers:237-. SAE 983160.|
|2015||Iwamoto M, Nakahira Y, Kimpara H. Development and validation of the Total HUman Model for Safety (THUMS) toward further understanding of occupant injury mechanisms in precrash and during crash. Traffic Inj Prev. June 1, 2015;16(suppl 1):S36-S48.|
|2009||Walsh JC. The Influence of Scoliosis and Wheechair Customisations in Rear Impact [PhD thesis]. Dublin, Ireland: Trinity College Dublin; 2009.|
|2018||Dowling-Medley J. Biomechanics of the Lower Cervical Spine During Shear Loading [Master's thesis]. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia; May 2018.|
|2019||Bosch KEB. Optimization of Underbody Blast Energy-Attenuating Seat Mechanisms Using Modified MADYMO Hybrid III and Human Body Models [PhD thesis]. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University; August 2019.|