The interaction of air bags with upper extremity test devices

Bass, C. R.; Duma, S. M.; Crandall, J. R.; George, S.; Kuppa, S.; Khaewpong, N.; Sun, E.; Eppinger, R.

Affiliations

³National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

Abstract

This study examines and compares the response of two upper extremity test devices under driver-side air bag deployment to contribute to the development of dummy surrogates for the investigation of primary contact forearm injuries during air bag deployments. The first of these test devices, the SAE 5th Percentile Female Arm (SAE Arm), is an anthropomorphic representation of a small female forearm and upper arm that is instrumented with load cells, accelerometers and potentiometers to enable the determination of upper extremity kinematics and dynamics. The second, the Research Arm Injury Device (RAID), is a simple beam test device designed for detailed investigation of moments and accelerations resulting from close contact in the initial stages of air bag deployment. The RAID includes strain gauges distributed along its length to measure the distribution of moment applied by the air bag deployment.

The study used four air bags representing a wide range of aggressivities in the current automobile fleet. The upper extremity position was a ‘natural’ driving posture when turning left with one hand across the steering wheel. The forearm was positioned directly on the air bag module with the forearm oriented perpendicular to the air bag module tear seam. For the SAE Arm, the humerus was oriented normal to the steering wheel. Tests with the SAE Arm were performed both with the arm attached to a 5’ Percentile Female Hybrid III dummy and with the arm mounted to a universal joint test fixture. TheRAID was mounted to an articulated test fixture. In addition to the dynamic tests, a detailed comparison of the inertial properties of each of the test devices with the inertial properties of a typical small female was performed.

Forearm response from both test devices confirmed the levels of air bag aggressivity determined using previous cadaveric injury results. In addition, logistic risk functions for forearm fracture were developed using existing cadaver studies and the moment response of each test device. These risk functions indicate that for 50% risk of ulna or ulna/radius fractures, the SAE arm peak forearm moment is 61 N-m (+/- 13 N-m standard deviation) while the RAID peak forearm moment is 373 N-m (+/- 83 N-m standard deviation). For 50% risk of fracture of both the ulna and the radius, the SAE arm peak dummy forearm moment is 91 N-m (+/- 14 N-m standard deviation) while the RAID peak forearm moment is 473 N-m (+/- 60 N-m standard deviation).

Links

URL: http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/pdf/esv/esv16/98s7o12.pdf

Cited Works (8)

Year	Entry
1995	Huelke DF, Moore JL, Compton TW, Samuels J, Levine RS. Upper extremity injuries related to airbag deployments. J Trauma. April 1995;38(4):482-488.
1976	Carter DR, Hayes WC. Bone compressive strength: the influence of density and strain rate. Science. September 10, 1976;194(4270):1174-1176.
1997	Bass CR, Duma SM, Crandall JR, Morris R, Martin P, Pilkey WD, Hurwitz S, Khaewpong N, Eppinger R, Sun E. The interaction of air bags with upper extremities. In: Proceedings of the 41st Stapp Car Crash Conference. November 13-14, 1997; Lake Buena Vista, FL. Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers:111-129. SAE 973324.
1996	Saul RA, Backaitis SH, Beebe MS, Ore LS. Hybrid III dummy instrumentation and assessment of arm injuries during air bag deployment. In: Proceedings of the 40th Stapp Car Crash Conference. November 4-6, 1996; Albuquerque, NM. Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers:85-94. SAE 962417.
1997	Schreiber P, Crandall J, Micek T, Hurwitz S, Nusholtz GS. Static and dynamic bending strength of the leg. In: Proceedings of the 1997 International IRCOBI Conference on the Biomechanics of Impact. September 24-26, 1997; Hannover, Germany.99-113.
1995	Freedman EL, Safran MR, Meals RA. Automotive airbag-related upper extremity injuries: a report of three cases. J Trauma. April 1995;38(4):577-581.
1997	Kuppa SM, Olson MB, Yeiser CW, Taylor LM, Morgan RM, Eppinger RH. RAID: an investigative tool to study air bag/upper extremity interactions. In: Proceedings of the SAE International Congress & Exposition. February 24-27, 1997; Detroit, MI. Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers. SAE 970399.
1977	Jurist JM, Foltz AS. Human ulnar bending stiffness, mineral content, geometry and strength. J Biomech. 1977;10(8):455-459.

Cited By (2)

Year	Entry
1998	Duma SM, Crandall JR, Pilkey WD, Seki K, Aoki T. 5th % female dummy upper extremity interaction with a deploying side air bag. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV). May 31–June 4, 1998; Windsor, Ontario, Canada.1135-1142.
2003	Van Rooij L, Bours R, Van Hoof J, Mihm JJ, Ridella SA, Bass CR, Crandall JR. The development, validation and application of a finite element upper extremity model subjected to air bag loading. Stapp Car Crash J. 2003;47:55-78. SAE 2003-22-0004.