Behavioral, Functional, and Shape Assessment for Temporomandibular Joint

Links

URL: https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_dissertations/2097

PROQUEST: 2058680070

Abstract

Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorders affect over 10 million people in the US with an annual economic cost of more than $4 billion. Due to intriguing etiological factors of TMJ disorders, objective and accurate diagnosis is difficult and so is with the treatment. Consequently, there is the high recurrence rate. To make the situation even worse, many other types of diseases, including cancer, share symptoms and signs with TMJ disorders. Early non-invasive, objective, subject-specific and accurate diagnosis is vital because incorrect or delayed diagnosis can cause patients to miss optimal treatment times, increase unnecessary therapy expenses and even endanger patients’ lives. The gold standard diagnostic criteria for TMJ disorders (DC/TMD) largely depend on subjective decisions, and therefore, it is necessary to develop a patient specific, non-invasive, and quantitative assessment system, to identify possible risk indicators for the objective early diagnosis of TMJ disorders and to determine their etiological biomechanical mechanisms by investigating the underlying biomechanical and transport pathophysiology of these indicators. As a result, significant advances in biomechanics and nutrient supply research are essential for early diagnosis and management. Common symptoms of joint sounds, limited or asymmetrical jaw movement, teeth misalignment, pain in the muscle, jaw or neck and jaw muscle stiffness indicate that an objective TMJ disorders diagnosis is necessary and should include TMJ muscle, motion and morphology assessment. Also, compared to other well-developed joint systems such as knee, glenohumeral and hip joints, TMJ has received less attention in biomechanics research because of the joint’s complexity in anatomy, neuromuscular recruitment and motion. The direct in vivo experimental measurement for articular space, contact force, stress distribution and nutrient supply in subject-specific TMJ components is superior to other means when a subject-specific diagnosis result is required. However, the TMJ complex anatomy, together with dense blood vessels and surrounding neuron system impedes the direct in vivo measurement in humans without breaking joint function integrity. The continuous development of advanced high-technologies has facilitated the development of many numerous scientific and objective diagnosis tools. Therefore, the objectives of this research are to: 1) build a non-invasive data collection system of TMJ motion, muscular electromyography and bite force and 2) determine the behavioral, functional, and morphological aspects for objective diagnosis of TMJ disorders and understanding the underlying pathology. Our central hypothesis is that TMJ properties of muscle, motion, and shape in patients are sensitive to TMJ disorders and, therefore, can be adapted to enhancing objective diagnosis criteria, functional rehabilitation assessment, therapeutic monitor and understanding the underlying pathology. Aim 1: Determine the muscle activity pattern by calculating EMG parameters for TMJ muscles of mastication. Aim 2: Determine the feature of TMJ kinematics by collecting TMJ motion tracking data and analyzing TMJ motion. Aim 3: Determine the patient-specific TMJ 3D shape signature. The outcome of this study will yield a data collection system for establishing an objective and subject-specific diagnosis and will build a pathway between biomechanics and the pathophysiology

Cited Works (18)

Year	Entry
1992	Ateshian GA, Rosenwasser MP, Mow VC. Curvature characteristics and congruence of the thumb carpometacarpal joint: differences between female and male joints. J Biomech. June 1992;25(6):591-607.
1991	Ateshian G, Soslowsky L, Mow V. Quantitation of articular surface topography and cartilage thickness in knee joints using stereophotogrammetry. J Biomech. January 1991;24(8):761-776.
2002	Wu G, Siegler S, Allard P, Kirtley C, Leardini A, Rosenbaum D, Whittle M, D'Lima DD, Cristofolini L, Witte H, Schmid O, Stokes I. ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate system of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion, I: ankle, hip, and spine. J Biomech. 2002;35(4):543-548.
1991	Blankevoort L, Kuiper JH, Huiskes R, Grootenboer HJ. Articular contact in a three-dimensional model of the knee. J Biomech. 1991;24(11):1019-1031.
2005	Wu G, van der Helm FCT, Veeger HEJ, Makhsous M, Van Roy P, Anglin C, Nagels J, Karduna AR, McQuade K, Wang X, Werner FW, Buchholz B. ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate systems of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion, II: shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand. J Biomech. May 2005;38(5):981-992.
2011	Makris EA, Hadidi P, Athanasiou KA. The knee meniscus: structure–function, pathophysiology, current repair techniques, and prospects for regeneration. Biomaterials. October 2011;32(30):7411-7431.
1980	Spoor CW, Veldpaus FE. Rigid body motion calculated from spatial co-ordinates of markers. J Biomech. 1980;13(4):391-393.
2004	Almarza AJ, Athanasiou KA. Design characteristics for the tissue engineering of cartilaginous tissues. Ann Biomed Eng. January 2004;32(1):2-17.
2008	Singh M, Detamore MS. Tensile properties of the mandibular condylar cartilage. J Biomech Eng. February 2008;130(1):011009.
1992	Soslowsky LJ, Flatow EL, Bigliani LU, Pawluk RJ, Ateshian GA, Mow VC. Quantitation of in situ contact areas at the glenohumeral joint: a biomechanical study. J Orthop Res. July 1992;10(4):524-534.
1983	Grood ES, Suntay WJ. A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee. J Biomech Eng. May 1983;105(2):136-144.
1993	Cole GK, Nigg BM, Ronsky JL, Yeadon MR. Application of the joint coordinate system to three-dimensional joint attitude and movement representation: a standardization proposal. J Biomech Eng. November 1993;115(4A):344-349.
1994	Ateshian GA, Kwak SD, Soslowsky LJ, Mow VC. A stereophotogrammetric method for determining in situ contact areas in diarthrodial joints, and a comparison with other methods. J Biomech. January 1994;27(1):111-124.
2004	Bibby SRS, Urban JPG. Effect of nutrient deprivation on the viability of intervertebral disc cells. Eur Spine J. December 2004;13(8):695-701.
1986	Wolff J. The Law of Bone Remodelling. Maquet P, Furlong R, trans. New York, NY: Springer; 1986.
2005	Schwartz MH, Rozumalski A. A new method for estimating joint parameters from motion data. J Biomech. January 2005;38(1):107-116.
2003	Detamore MS, Athanasiou KA. Motivation, characterization, and strategy for tissue engineering the temporomandibular joint disc. Tissue Eng. December 2003;9(6):1065-1087.
1996	Cappozzo A, Catani F, Leardini A, Benedetti M, Della Croce U. Position and orientation in space of bones during movement: experimental artefacts. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). March 1996;11(2):90-100.