Four-hundred forty two U-M CIREN (University of Michigan Crash Injury Research and Engineering Network) cases have previously been compared to crash tests used in the automotive industry. The comparison demonstrated that the majority of cases were similar in crash configuration and extent to industry crash tests, while smaller proportions either had a greater extent of crash deformation or had different crash configurations than those commonly produced in crash tests.
Of the 442 cases, 290 frontal cases were analyzed in greater detail to understand trends in injury causation while considering physical characteristics of occupants (gender, age, body mass index.) Those trends were then evaluated in the context of biomechanics of crash test tools such as Anthropomorphic Test Devices [ATDs] and injury risk curves. Several trends were identified and presented.