Healing trabecular microfractures are a common feature in cancellous bone. These lesions, when observed in macerated cancellous bone slices, measure about 500 p,m in diameter and surround fractures in trabeculae with microcallus. Whether microcallus is a structure acting primarily as a transient brace, preventing relative movement of the fragmented segments and enabling the trabecula to heal, or whether it is a permanent buttress reducing the stress on the fractured strut, preventing the healing process, is not known. Microfractures are the result of normal physical activity. Hence, the widespread occurrence of trabecular microfracture in cancellous bone implies that a reasonable rate of microfracture is physiologically tolerable. There are three putative effects for trabecular microfracture. One is that, in response to impulse loading, cancellous subchondral bone increases its rigidity due to osteosclerosis resulting from bone formed around microfractures. Another hypothesis is that, if sufficient trabecular microfractures occur, they will compromise the trabecular structure of the vertebra and the proximal femur leading to osteoporotic fracture. By inducing remodeling changes, microfractures have an effect on the maintenance of joint structure. There are two histological patterns for microfractures:​ an early stage, when actively forming woven bone is bridging the fracture;​ and a more common late stage, when woven bone is inactive. Femoral studies fail to demonstrate that an increasing number of healed or healing microfractures in osteoarthrosis causes the increase of bone in the head of femur. Only one study has reported a significant increase in the number of trabecular microfractures in osteoarthrotic femoral heads compared with normal controls. This significant increase was in patients taking antiinflammatory drugs. In osteoporotic fracture, sufficient trabecutar microfracture may lead to femoral fracture. The bone loss in the vertebral bodies is by a loss of horizontal trabeculae. This loss reduces the resistance of vertical elements to deformation under load and creates the conditions for trabecular fracture. Coincident with this observation, microfracture is most prevalent on the vertical structure. The increase of microfractures with increasing age has three possible explanations:​ (l) the incidence of microfracture increases as trabeculae become thinner;​ (2) the incidence of microfracture is constant but the rate of healing decreases;​ or (3) these two factors combine to increase the number of microfractures. The occurrence of trabecular microfracture has been shown to correlate with factors such as physical activity, age, bone viability and remodeling potential, cancellous bone volume, bone mineral content, bone fatigue properties, and the direction of cancellous bone loading. As trabecular microfracture is not an event that initiates a pathological process, a number of important questions need to be addressed. Whatever the answers to these questions, trabecular microfracture is intimately linked to the nature of cancellous bone structure, and the conditions under which microfracture will compromise this structure are fundamental to the question of bone quality. Key words:​