Performance of seating systems in a FMVSS No. 301 rear impact crash test

Saunders, III, James W.; Molino, Louis N.; Kuppa, Shashi; McKoy, Felicia L.

Seating systems are designed for occupant comfort as well as for affording occupant protection in various crash modes. FMVSS No. 207 specifies seat performance criteria, of which, one requires that a seat back withstand a minimum of 373 Nm moment measured about the seating reference point. The sufficiency of this requirement has been a source of significant debate. Some researchers believe that the potential hazards from a seat back collapsing in a rear impact include: the inability to control the vehicle in the event of a second impact, ejection of the occupant from the seat and injury to the rear seat occupant when struck by the front seat.

Molino (1998) reported that the average yield strength and average ultimate strength for all seats tested were 2.1 times and 3.4 times the current standard respectively. In spite of the greater strength of current production seats than FMVSS No. 207 requirements, there are still anecdotal cases of front and rear occupant injuries and fatalities due to seat back collapse (Saczalski, Cantor). NHTSA has in the past stated that improving seating system performance may be more complex than simply increasing the strength of the seat (57 FR 54958). Seat back force-deflection characteristics and energy management along with occupant interaction with the seat upholstery, head restraint and belt restraints may all play critical roles in mitigation of injuries in rear impacts.

This paper examines the performance of original equipment manufacturer (OEM) seat systems in a series of FMVSS No. 301 crash tests of 2002 model year vehicles by using the instrumented 50th percentile male Hybrid III dummy.

Year

Entry

1993

Svensson MY, Aldman B, Hansson HA, Lövsund P, Seeman T, Suneson A, Örtengren T. Pressure effects in the spinal canal during whiplash extension motion: a possible cause of injury to the cervical spinal ganglia. In: Proceedings of the 1993 International IRCOBI Conference on the Biomechanics of Impact. September 8-10, 1993; Eindhoven, The Netherlands.189-200.

2001

Schmitt K-U, Muser MH, Niederer P. A new neck injury criterion candidate for rear-end collisions taking into account shear forces and bending moments. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV). June 4-7, 2001; Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

2000

Langwieder K, Hell W, Schick S, Muser M, Walz F, Zellmer H. Evolution of a dynamic seat test standard proposal for a better protection after rear-end impact. In: Proceedings of the 2000 International IRCOBI Conference on the Biomechanics of Impact. September 20-22, 2000; Montpellier, France.393-409.

1991

Warner CY, Stother CE, James MB, Decker RL. Occupant protection in rear-end collisions, II: the role of seat back deformation in injury reduction. In: Proceedings of the 35th Stapp Car Crash Conference. November 18-20, 1991; San Diego, CA. Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers:379-390. SAE 912914.

1997

Prasad P, Kim A, Weerappuli DPV, Roberts V, Schneider D. Relationships between passenger car seat back strength and occupant injury severity in rear end collisions: field and laboratory studies. In: Proceedings of the 41st Stapp Car Crash Conference. November 13-14, 1997; Lake Buena Vista, FL. Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers:417-449. SAE 973343.