Relationships between passenger car seat back strength and occupant injury severity in rear end collisions: field and laboratory studies

wbldb

Prasad, P.¹; Kim, A.¹; Weerappuli, D. P. V.¹; Roberts, V.²; Schneider, D.³

Relationships between passenger car seat back strength and occupant injury severity in rear end collisions: field and laboratory studies

Proceedings of the 41st Stapp Car Crash Conference

Affiliations

¹Ford Motor Company

²Institute for Product Safety

³Biokinetic Engineering, Inc.
Abstract

Recent design characteristic changes in a small segment of production passenger car front seats have focused attention on the influence of seat back strength on occupant kinematics and potentially injurious loads placed on occupants during rear end collisions.

The National Accident Sampling Study database from the years of 1980 to 1993 was interrogated to determine the relationship between vehicle change in velocity, and the nature and severity of injuries sustained by passengers occupying those seats in rear end collisions.

The results of the NASS data analysis show that the yielding seats in most current automobiles perform well as a passive restraint system. When the yielding passenger car seats are compared to the stiffer seat/cab, the passenger car seats offered improved protection. Additionally, the data indicate that the three point restraint system provides protection and restraint for front seat occupants in rear impact.

To determine what effect seat back stiffness and other seat characteristics have on occupant responses, several seats were evaluated in dynamic Hyge rear impact sled simulations. Two types of production seats, with yielding seat backs, were modified to obtain higher seat back stiffness characteristics. Other production seats were chosen for various design features (i.e. head restraint and seat geometry, recliner systems, integrated seat belts, etc.), as well as seat back stiffness. All the seats were tested in a rigid environment with a restrained Hybrid III dummy. Seats A, A-M, and A-R, were tested at ΔVs of 9, 16, and 24 kph; all the other seats were tested at these speeds and also at a 40 kph ΔV.

The results of the sled tests indicated that stiffer seats do not have any consistent advantages over yielding seats for the complete range of speeds tested. When the production seats were modified to obtain higher seat back stiffness, higher responses were seen at the neck, thoracic spine, and lumbar spine. The other, stiffer production seats of different design also showed no consistent improvement in occupant protection across the speed range. Even a seat with a head restraint located closer to the center of gravity of the occupant's head did not perform better than the baseline seat. Throughout the testing, the most sensitive response to seat design and crash severity was the lower neck extension moment.
Links

DOI: 10.4271/973343

SAE: 973343

Cited By (24)

Year	Entry
2015	Prasad P. Injury criteria and motor vehicle regulations. In: Yoganandan N, Nahum AM, Melvin JW, eds. Accidental Injury: Biomechanics and Prevention. 3rd ed. New York: Springer; 2015:793-809.
2008	Jermakian JS, Arbogast KB, Durbin DR, Kallan MJ. Injury risk for children in rear impacts: role of the front seat occupant. In: 52nd Annual Proceedings, Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine (AAAM). October 6-8, 2008; San Diego, CA.109-115.
2003	Kleinberger M, Voo L, Merkle A, Bevan M, Chang S-S, McKoy F. The role of seatback and head restraint design parameters on rear impact occupant dynamics. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV). May 19-22, 2003; Nagoya, Japan.
2003	Saunders JW III, Molino LN, Kuppa S, McKoy FL. Performance of seating systems in a FMVSS No. 301 rear impact crash test. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV). May 19-22, 2003; Nagoya, Japan.
2003	Heitplatz F, Sferco R, Fay P, Reim J, Kim A, Prasad P. An evaluation of existing and proposed injury criteria with various dummies to determine their ability to predict the levels of soft tissue neck injury seen in real world accidents. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV). May 19-22, 2003; Nagoya, Japan.
2011	Mango N, Garthe E. Standard & integrated restraint first row seat performance in rear-impact crashes. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV). June 13-16, 2011; Washington, DC.
2007	Kang Y, Moorhouse K, Stammen J, Bolte J IV. An experimental seat for measuring external biofidelity in rear impacts. In: Proceedings of the 35th International Workshop on Human Subjects for Biomechanical Research. 2007.29-46.
1998	Ono K, Kaneoka K, Inami S. Influence of seat properties on human cervical vertebral motion and head/neck/torso kinematics during rear-end impacts. In: Proceedings of the 1998 International IRCOBI Conference on the Biomechanics of Impact. September 16-18, 1998; Göteberg, Sweden.303-318.
2000	Ishikawa T, Okano N, Ishikura K, Ono K. An evaluation of prototype seats using BioRID-P3 and Hybrid III with TRLD neck. In: Proceedings of the 2000 International IRCOBI Conference on the Biomechanics of Impact. September 20-22, 2000; Montpellier, France.379-391.
2003	Eriksson L, Kullgren A. Influence of seat geometry and seating posture on NIC_max and N_km AIS 1 neck injury predictability. In: Proceedings of the 2003 International IRCOBI Conference on the Biomechanics of Impact. September 25, 2003; Lisbon, Portugal.217-231.
2010	Marathe R, Chawla A, Mukherjee S, Malhotra R. Prediction of lumbar spine posture for repositioning of spinal FE model. In: Proceedings of the 2010 International IRCOBI Conference on the Biomechanics of Impact. September 15-17, 2010; Hannover, Germany.85-88.
2019	Edwards MA, Brumbelow ML, Trempel RE, Gorjanc TC. Seat design characteristics affecting occupant safety in low- and high-severity rear-impact collisions. In: Proceedings of the 2019 International IRCOBI Conference on the Biomechanics of Injury. September 11-13, 2019; Florence, Italy.13-31.
2019	Kang Y-S, Moorhouse K, Bolte JH IV. Head trajectories of post mortem human surrogates in moderate-speed rear impacts. In: Proceedings of the 2019 International IRCOBI Conference on the Biomechanics of Injury. September 11-13, 2019; Florence, Italy.102-118.
2021	Parenteau CS, Viano DC. Serious head, neck and spine injuries in rear impacts: frequency and sources. In: Proceedings of the 2021 International IRCOBI Conference on the Biomechanics of Injury. September 8-10, 2021; Online.1-12.
2021	Kang Y-S, Millis W, Thomas C, Stricklin J, Willis A, Pradhan V, Tesny A, Kwon HJ, Ramachandra R, Moorhouse K. Head-to-T1 relative rotation of the BioRID-II, Hybrid III, and post mortem human subjects with increased backsets in moderate-speed rear impacts. In: Proceedings of the 2021 International IRCOBI Conference on the Biomechanics of Injury. September 8-10, 2021; Online.732-752.
2000	Stephens GD, Long TJ, Blaisdell DM. Energy analysis of automotive seat systems. In: Proceedings of the SAE World Congress. March 6-9, 2000; Detroit, MI. Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers. SAE 2000-01-1380.
2010	Pintar FA, Yoganandan N, Maiman DJ. Lower cervical spine loading in frontal sled tests using inverse dynamics: potential applications for lower neck injury criteria. Stapp Car Crash J. 2010;54:133-166. SAE 2010-22-0008.
2012	Kang Y-S, Bolte JH IV, Moorhouse K, Donnelly B, Herriott R, Mallory A. Biomechanical responses of PMHS in moderate-speed rear impacts and development of response targets for evaluating the internal and external biofidelity of ATDs. Stapp Car Crash J. October 2012;56:105-170.
2002	Schmitt K-U, Muser MH, Walz FH, Niederer PF. N_km: a proposal for a neck protection criterion for low-speed rear-end impacts. Traffic Inj Prev. 2002;3(2):117-126.
2003	Viano DC. Seat influences on female neck responses in rear crashes: a reason why women have higher whiplash rates. Traffic Inj Prev. 2003;4(3):228-239.
2011	Viano DC, Parenteau CS. BioRID dummy responses in matched ABTS and conventional seat tests on the IIHS rear sled. Traffic Inj Prev. 2011;12(4):339-346.
2013	Van Toen CY. Biomechanics of Cervical Spine and Spinal Cord Injury Under Combined Axial Compression and Lateral Bending Loading [PhD thesis]. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia; December 2013.
2023	Fugger BJ. Estimating Rotator Cuff Injury Risk During Rear-End Vehicle Collisions Using OpenSim [Master's thesis]. University of Texas at Tyler; May 2023.
2019	Tatem WM. The Crash Injury Risk to Rear Seated Passenger Vehicle Occupants [PhD thesis]. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; December 13, 2019.