Today, human models are frequently used for improvements in occupant and pedestrian protection. The models have been carefully prepared with respect to anthropometric and biomechanical validity but do not include muscle activity.
Hence, primary safety issues cannot be addressed by the model, since during low loading the model is not stabilized by muscles. Therefore, the OM4IS (“Occupant Model for Integrated Safety”) project was initiated by a large consortium including scientific (Virtual Vehicle Research and Test Center, Graz University of Technology, Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen BASt) and industry (PDB, Bosch, Toyoda Gosei Europe, TRW, DYNAmore GmbH) to examine muscle activity from volunteer tests and implement the results in a human model. The second aim is to find movement patterns which will be integrated in the simulation to develop active restraint systems.
The main focus in this project is set on two different driving maneuvers. The first one is an emergency braking maneuver the second one is a lane change maneuver. In a first step these two maneuvers were simulated with sled tests and later these maneuvers had been carried out with a real vehicle on a test track. The purpose of the sled tests was to generate first input data for the numerical simulation and to check if it is possible to measure necessary information without vehicle tests. A seat was fixed on a sled and accelerated longitudinally to simulate the emergency braking maneuver and afterwards turned by 90 degrees to simulate lateral loading.
In total eleven volunteers, weight and height correlated to the 50% male, were tested and analyzed. Kinematic analyses were performed using two different motion capturing systems, one infrared based system and one high-speed video system. Two different systems were chosen to evaluate the adaptability for vehicle tests. Additionally muscle activity was measured with surface EMG (Electromyography) for upper body muscles.
First results showed a significant difference among volunteers. Repeated tests with the same volunteer showed minor differences. Movement patterns varied significantly between different tests. Detailed information concerning simulation is presented in a separate paper [7].