The role of bone metastases on the mechanical competence of human vertebrae

Palanca, Marco; Cavazzoni, Giulia; Dall'Ara, Enrico

Affiliations

¹Dept of Oncology and Metabolism, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK

²INSIGNEO Institute for In Silico Medicine, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK

³Dept of Industrial Engineering, Alma Mater Studiorum – University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy

Abstract and keywords

Spine is the most common site for bone metastases. The evaluation of the mechanical competence and failure location in metastatic vertebrae is a biomechanical and clinical challenge. Little is known about the failure behaviour of vertebrae with metastatic lesions. The aim of this study was to use combined micro-Computed Tomography (microCT) and time-lapsed mechanical testing to reveal the failure location in metastatic vertebrae.

Fifteen spine segments, each including a metastatic and a radiologically healthy vertebra, were tested in compression up to failure within a microCT. Volumetric strains were measured using Digital Volume Correlation. The images of undeformed and deformed specimens were overlapped to identify the failure location.

Vertebrae with lytic metastases experienced the largest average compressive strains (median ± standard deviation: −8506 ± 4748microstrain), followed by the vertebrae with mixed metastases (−7035 ± 15605microstrain), the radiologically healthy vertebrae (−5743 ± 5697microstrain), and the vertebrae with blastic metastases (−3150 ± 4641microstrain). Strain peaks were localised within and nearby the lytic lesions or around the blastic tissue. Failure between the endplate and the metastasis was identified in vertebrae with lytic metastases, whereas failure localised around the metastasis in vertebrae with blastic lesions.

This study showed for the first time the role of metastases on the vertebral internal deformations. While lytic lesions lead to failure of the metastatic vertebra, vertebrae with blastic metastases are more likely to induce failure in the adjacent vertebrae. Nevertheless, every metastatic lesion affects the vertebral deformation differently, making it essential to assess how the lesion affects the bone microstructure. These results suggest that the properties of the lesion (type, size, location within the vertebral body) should be considered when developing clinical tools to predict the risk of fracture in patients with metastatic lesions.

Keywords: Metastasis; Vertebrae; Ex vivo test; Strain analysis; Digital volume correlation; Failure location

Links

DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2023.116814

PubMed: 37257631

WoS: 001016805800001

History

Received: 2023-03-15

Revised: 2023-05-3

Accepted: 2023-05-23

Online: 2023-05-29

Cited Works (23)

Year	Entry
2000	Whealan KM, Kwak SD, Tedrow JR, Inoue K, Snyder BD. Noninvasive imaging predicts failure load of the spine with simulated osteolytic defects. J Bone Joint Surg. September 2000;82A(9):1240-1251.
2006	Eswaran SK, Gupta A, Adams MF, Keaveny TM. Cortical and trabecular load sharing in the human vertebral body. J Bone Miner Res. February 2006;21(2):307-314.
1988	Sahoo PK, Soltani S, Wong AKC. A survey of thresholding techniques. Comput Vis Graph Image Proc. 1988;41(2):233-260.
2004	Nazarian A, Müller R. Time-lapsed microstructural imaging of bone failure behavior. J Biomech. 2004;37(1):55-65.
2012	Hussein AI, Barbone PE, Morgan EF. Digital volume correlation for study of the mechanics of whole bones. Procedia Eng. 2012;4:116-125.
2008	Kazakia GJ, Burghardt AJ, Cheung S, Majumdar S. Assessment of bone tissue mineralization by conventional x-ray microcomputed tomography: comparison with synchrotron radiation microcomputed tomography and ash measurements. Med Phys. 2008;35(7):3170-3179.
2006	Nazarian A, Stauber M, Zurakowski D, Snyder BD, Müller R. The interaction of microstructure and volume fraction in predicting failure in cancellous bone. Bone. December 2006;39(6):1196-1202.
2008	Nazarian A, von Stechow D, Zurakowski D, Müller R, Snyder BD. Bone volume fraction explains the variation in strength and stiffness of cancellous bone affected by metastatic cancer and osteoporosis. Calcif Tiss Int. December 2008;83(6):368-379.
2021	Palanca M, Barbanti-Bròdano G, Marras D, Marciante M, Serra M, Gasbarrini A, Dall'Ara E, Cristofolini L. Type, size, and position of metastatic lesions explain the deformation of the vertebrae under complex loading conditions. Bone. October 2021;151:116028.
2010	Bouxsein ML, Boyd SK, Christiansen BA, Guldberg RE, Jepsen KJ, Müller R. Guidelines for assessment of bone microstructure in rodents using micro-computed tomography. J Bone Miner Res. July 2010;25(7):1468-1486.
1987	Lanyon LE. Functional strain in bone tissue as an objective, and controlling stimulus for adaptive bone remodelling. J Biomech. 1987;20(11-12):1083-1093.
2021	Lems WF, Paccou J, Zhang J, Fuggle NR, Chandran M, Harvey NC, Cooper C, Javaid K, Ferrari S, Akesson KE; International Osteoporosis Foundation Fracture Working Group. Vertebral fracture: epidemiology, impact and use of DXA vertebral fracture assessment in fracture liaison services. Osteoporos Int. March 2021;32(3):399-411.
2004	Roodman GD. Mechanisms of bone metastasis. NEJM. April 15, 2004;350(16):1655-1664.
2002	Ehrlich PJ, Lanyon LE. Mechanical strain and bone cell function: a review. Osteoporos Int. September 2002;13(9):688-700.
2020	Stadelmann MA, Schenk DE, Maquer G, Lenherr C, Buck FM, Bosshardt DD, Hoppe S, Theumann N, Alkalay RN, Zysset PK. Conventional finite element models estimate the strength of metastatic human vertebrae despite alterations of the bone's tissue and structure. Bone. December 2020;141:115598.
2022	Bailey S, Stadelmann MA, Zysset PK, Vashishth D, Alkalay RN. Influence of metastatic bone lesion type and tumor origin on human vertebral bone architecture, matrix quality, and mechanical properties. J Bone Miner Res. May 2022;37(5):896-907.
2020	McKay M, Jackman TM, Hussein AI, Guermazi A, Liu J, Morgan EF. Association of vertebral endplate microstructure with bone strength in men and women. Bone. February 2020;131:115147.
2016	Jackman TM, DelMonaco AM, Morgan EF. Accuracy of finite element analyses of CT scans in predictions of vertebral failure patterns under axial compression and anterior flexion. J Biomech. January 25, 2016;49(2):267-275.
2017	Dall’Ara E, Peña-Fernández M, Palanca M, Giorgi M, Cristofolini L, Tozzi G. Precision of digital volume correlation approaches for strain analysis in bone imaged with micro-computed tomography at different dimensional levels. Front Mater. November 8, 2017;4:31.
2014	Dall’Ara E, Barber D, Viceconti M. About the inevitable compromise between spatial resolution and accuracy of strain measurement for bone tissue: a 3D zero-strain study. J Biomech. September 22, 2014;47(12):2956-2963.
2010	Fields AJ, Lee GL, Keaveny TM. Mechanisms of initial endplate failure in the human vertebral body. J Biomech. 2010;43(16):3126-3131.
2003	Whyne CM, Hu SS, Lotz JC. Burst fracture in the metastatically involved spine: development, validation, and parametric analysis of a three-dimensional poroelastic finite-element model. Spine. April 1, 2003;28(7):652-660.
2016	Palanca M, Cristofolini L, Dall’Ara E, Curto M, Innocente F, Danesi V, Tozzi G. Digital volume correlation can be used to estimate local strains in natural and augmented vertebrae: an organ-level study. J Biomech. December 8, 2016;49(16):3882-3890.