Stabilization Strategies of the Lumbar Spine in Vivo

In developing a method of quantifying stab ility in the lumbar spine Cholewicki and McGill (1996) have also broached the notion of suff icient stability, where too much stiffness (and stability) would hinder motion. Thus people highly skilled at maintaining stability may use different and optimal strategies, where "sufficient" stability is maintained. The purpose of this work was to explore the contributors to "sufficient" stability, how they coordinate and relate to injury mechanisms.

This work represents a cascade of investigations where. 1) To explore the balance of various sources of stiffness and their effect on the critical load and post-buckling behaviour, simulations were undertaken where the buckled configuration of the spine was predicted and its stability in this new configuration was assessed. 2) The various sources of stiffness contributing to stability in the lumbar spine have been in so me cases found to be deficient. The question of how these deficiencies place individuals at risk of instability, if at all, remains unresolved. A challenged breathing task was used to determine if there was a difference in stabilizing potential between healthy individuals and low back pain sufferers. Given that differences in stabilizing potential are apparent, several tasks which included a predetermined motor strategy, such as 3) pressurizing the abdomen and 4) abdominal hollowing vs. muscle bracing, were evaluated to determine if individuals can utilize motor strategies to augment stability. The stabilizing potential of abdominal pressure (IAP) and its interaction with muscle activation was evaluated.

Some individuals are more skilled at stabilizing their lumbar spine than others. Some consciously controlled motor strategies are better stabilizers than others. These strategies highlight the relative contributions of various components (posture, passive tissue, muscle activation, and load) in that no single muscle dominates stability and IAP appears to augment stability beyond muscle activation alone. The margin of safety is considerable and depends on the task at hand, but it is possible to speculate on which tissues are at greatest risk of injury.

Year	Entry
2002	Kettler A, Hartwig E, Schultheiß M, Claes L, Wilke H-J. Mechanically simulated muscle forces strongly stabilize intact and injured upper cervical spine specimens. J Biomech. March 2002;35(3):339-346.
1999	Cholewicki J, Juluru K, Radebold A, Panjabi MM, McGill SM. Lumbar spine stability can be augmented with an abdominal belt and/or increased intra-abdominal pressure. Eur Spine J. October 1999;8(5):388-395.
1978	White AA III, Panjabi MM. Clinical Biomechanics of the Spine. Philadelphia, PA: J.B. Lippincott Company; 1978.
1985	McGill SM, Norman RW. Dynamically and statically determined low back moments during lifting. J Biomech. 1985;18(12):877-885.
1961	Morris JM, Lucas DB, Bresler B. Role of the trunk in stability of the spine. J Bone Joint Surg. April 1961;43A(3):327-351.
1994	Cholewicki J, McGill SM. EMG assisted optimization: a hybrid approach for estimating muscle forces in an indeterminate biomechanical model. J Biomech. October 1994;27(10):1287-1289.
1973	Belytschko TB, Andriacchi TP, Schultz AB, Galante JO. Analog studies of forces in the human spine: computational techniques. J Biomech. July 1973;6(4):361-371.
1979	Schultz AB, Warwick DN, Berkson MH, Nachemson AL. Mechanical properties of human lumbar spine motion segments, I: responses in flexion, extension, lateral bending, and torsion. J Biomech Eng. February 1979;101(1):46-52.
1992	Crisco JJ, Panjabi MM, Yamamoto I, Oxland TR. Euler stability of the human ligamentous lumbar spine, II: experiment. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). February 1992;7(1):27-32.
1995	Wilke H-J, Wolf S, Claes LE, Arand M, Wiesend A. Stability increase of the lumbar spine with different muscle groups: a biomechanical in vitro study. Spine. January 15, 1995;20(2):192-198.
1991	Crisco JJ III, Panjabi MM. The intersegmental and multisegmental muscles of the lumbar spine: a biomechanical model comparing lateral stabilizing potential. Spine. July 1991;16(7):793-799.
1999	Cholewicki J, Juluru K, McGill SM. Intra-abdominal pressure mechanism for stabilizing the lumbar spine. J Biomech. January 1999;32(1):13-17.
1999	Patwardhan AG, Havey RM, Meade KP, Lee B, Dunlap B. A follower load increases the load-carrying capacity of the lumbar spine in compression. Spine. May 15, 1999;24(10):1003-1009.
1996	Cholewicki J, McGill SM. Mechanical stability of the in vivo lumbar spine: implications for injury and chronic low back pain. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). January 1996;11(1):1-15.
1991	Adams MA, Dolan P. A technique for quantifying the bending moment acting on the lumbar spine in vivo. J Biomech. 1991;24(2):117-126.
1991	Oxland TR, Panjabi MM, Southern EP, Duranceau JS. An anatomic basis for spinal instability: a porcine trauma model. J Orthop Res. May 1991;9(3):452-462.
1995	Stokes IAF, Gardner-Morse M. Lumbar spine maximum efforts and muscle recruitment patterns predicted by a model with multijoint muscles and joints with stiffness. J Biomech. February 1995;28(2):173-186.
1991	Janevic J, Ashton-Miller JA, Schultz AB. Large compressive preloads decrease lumbar motion segment flexibility. J Orthop Res. March 1991;9(2):228-236.
1994	McGill S, Seguin J, Bennett G. Passive stiffness of the lumber torso in flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial roatation: effect of belt wearing and breath holding. Spine. March 15, 1994;19(6):696-704.
1991	McGill SM. Electromyographic activity of the abdominal and low back musculature during the generation of isometric and dynamic axial trunk torque: implications for lumbar mechanics. J Orthop Res. January 1991;9(1):91-103.
1992	Bogduk N, Macintosh JE, Pearcy MJ. A universal model of the lumbar back muscles in the upright position. Spine. August 1992;17(8):897-913.
1996	Caraffa A, Cerulli G, Projetti M, Aisa G, Rizzo A. Prevention of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in soccer: a prospective controlled study of proprioceptive training. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1996;4(1):19-21.
1992	Panjabi MM. The stabilizing system of the spine, II: neutral zone and instability hypothesis. J Spinal Disord. December 1992;5(4):390-396.
1992	Panjabi MM. The stabilizing system of the spine, I: function, dysfunction, adaptation, and enhancement. J Spinal Disord. December 1992;5(4):383-389.
1989	Bergmark A. Stability of the lumbar spine: a study in mechanical engineering. Acta Orthop Scand. 1989;60(suppl 230):1-54.
1993	Waters TR, Putz-Anderson V, Garg A, Fine LJ. Revised NIOSH equation for the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks. Ergonomics. July 1993;36(7):749-776.
1976	Panjabi MM, Brand RA Jr, White AA III. Three-dimensional flexibility and stiffness properties of the human thoracic spine. J Biomech. 1976;9(4):185-192.

Year

Entry

2002

Kettler A, Hartwig E, Schultheiß M, Claes L, Wilke H-J. Mechanically simulated muscle forces strongly stabilize intact and injured upper cervical spine specimens. J Biomech. March 2002;35(3):339-346.

1999

Cholewicki J, Juluru K, Radebold A, Panjabi MM, McGill SM. Lumbar spine stability can be augmented with an abdominal belt and/or increased intra-abdominal pressure. Eur Spine J. October 1999;8(5):388-395.

1978

White AA III, Panjabi MM. Clinical Biomechanics of the Spine. Philadelphia, PA: J.B. Lippincott Company; 1978.

1985

McGill SM, Norman RW. Dynamically and statically determined low back moments during lifting. J Biomech. 1985;18(12):877-885.

1961

Morris JM, Lucas DB, Bresler B. Role of the trunk in stability of the spine. J Bone Joint Surg. April 1961;43A(3):327-351.