Method-based differences in the automated analysis of the three-dimensional morphology of trabecular bone

Simmons, Craig A.<sup>1,2</sup>; Hipp, John A.<sup>1,3</sup>

Affiliations

¹Orthopedic Biomechanics Laboratory, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Charles A. Dana Research Institute, Harvard Thorndike Laboratories, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.

²Current address: Centre for Biomaterials, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

³Current address: Institute for Spinal Disorders, Houston, Texas, U.S.A.

Abstract

The three‐dimensional (3D) morphology of trabecular bone is frequently quantified using computer programs. However, there are no standardized implementations of morphology programs and many variations are possible. Even though programs may use the same basic method, results can be significantly different because of differences in implementation. Morphology data from different laboratories therefore may not be comparable. The method of directed secants, with parallel plate assumptions, is commonly used to quantify 3D morphology. We examined the effect of several variations in the implementation of this method on measurements of trabecular plate number (Tb.N), trabecular thickness, and trabecular spacing. Three‐dimensional micromagnetic resonance images of 10 bovine trabecular bone specimens were analyzed using several variations of the directed secant method. An analysis of covariance with repeated measures suggested that variations in the algorithm used to count test line intersections, variations in the criteria used to classify a test coordinate as bone or marrow, and variations in the number of test grid rotations had significant effects on Tb.N (p < 0.0001). The largest difference in Tb.N (52%) was due to the method used to count test line intersections with the bone–marrow interface. Variations in the classification algorithm and variations in the number of test line grid rotations resulted in a 6% difference in Tb.N. The spacing of the test line grids did not affect Tb.N (p = 0.28), and all differences were independent of volume fraction (p = 0.67). These data show that there can be significant differences in trabecular bone morphology measurements due only to the method used for the measurements. To facilitate comparisons between laboratories, we have made validated computer programs to measure trabecular bone morphology available over the internet.

Links

DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.6.942

PubMed: 9169354

WoS: A1997XA47100012

History

Received: 1996-07-17

Revised: 1996-12-30

Accepted: 1997-01-29

Cited Works (16)

Year	Entry
1995	Kinney JH, Lane NE, Haupt DL. In vivo, three‐dimensional microscopy of trabecular bone. J Bone Miner Res. February 1995;10(2):264-270.
1993	Snyder BD, Piazza S, Edwards WT, Hayes WC. Role of trabecular morphology in the etiology of age-related vertebral fractures. Calcif Tiss Int. February 1993;53(suppl 1):S14-S22.
1995	Majumdar S, Newitt D, Jergas M, Gies A, Chiu E, Osman D, Keltner J, Keyak J, Genant H. Evaluation of technical factors affecting the quantification of trabecular bone structure using magnetic resonance imaging. Bone. October 1995;17(4):417-430.
1993	Odgaard A, Gundersen HJG. Quantification of connectivity in cancellous bone, with special emphasis on 3-D reconstructions. Bone. March–April 1993;14(2):173-182.
1996	Hipp JA, Jansujwicz A, Simmons CA, Snyder BD. Trabecular bone morphology from micro-magnetic resonance imaging. J Bone Miner Res. February 1996;11(2):286-292.
1990	Turner CH, Cowin SC, Rho JY, Ashman RB, Rice JC. The fabric dependence of the orthotropic elastic constants of cancellous bone. J Biomech. 1990;23(6):549-561.
1983	Parfitt AM. Stereologic basis of bone histomorphometry: theory of quantitative micorscopy and reconstruction of the third dimension. In: Recker RR, ed. Bone Histomorphometry: Techniques and Interpretation. Boca Raton, FL: Inc., CRC Press; 1983:53-87.
1990	Odgaard A, Andersen K, Melsen F, Gundersen HJG. A direct method for fast three-dimensional serial reconstruction. J Microsc (Oxford). September 1990;159(pt 3):335-342.
1990	Kuhn JL, Goldstein SA, Feldkamp LA, Goulet RW, Jesion G. Evaluation of a microcomputed tomography system to study trabecular bone structure. J Orthop Res. 1990;8(6):833-842.
1993	Dalstra M, Huiskes R, Odgaard A, van Erning L. Mechanical and textural properties of pelvic trabecular bone. J Biomech. April–May 1993;26(4-5):523-535.
1988	Mosekilde L. Age-related changes in vertebral trabecular bone architecture—assessed by a new method. Bone. 1988;9(4):247-250.
1993	Recker RR. Architecture and vertebral fracture. Calcif Tiss Int. 1993;53(suppl 1):S139-S142.
1994	Goulet RW, Goldstein SA, Ciarelli MJ, Kuhn JL, Brown MB, Feldkamp LA. The relationship between the structural and orthogonal compressive properties of trabecular bone. J Biomech. April 1994;27(4):375-389.
1989	Feldkamp LA, Goldstein SA, Parfitt MA, Jesion G, Kleerekoper M. The direct examination of three‐dimensional bone architecture in vitro by computed tomography. J Bone Miner Res. 1989;4(1):3-11.
1994	Compston JE. Connectivity of cancellous bone: assessment and mechanical implications. Bone. September–October 1994;15(5):463-466.
1987	Parfitt AM, Drezner MK, Glorieux FH, Kanis JA, Malluche H, Meunier PJ, Ott SM, Recker RR. Bone histomorphometry: standardization of nomenclature, symbols, and units: report of the ASBMR histomorphometry nomenclature committee. J Bone Miner Res. December 1987;2(6):595-610.

Cited By (21)

Year	Entry
2002	Müller R. The Zürich experience: one decade of three-dimensional high-resolution computed tomography. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2002;13(5):307-322.
2021	Callens SJP, Tourolle né Betts DC, Müller R, Zadpoor AA. The local and global geometry of trabecular bone. Acta Biomater. August 2021;130:343-361.
1999	Genant HK, Gordon C, Jiang Y, Lang TF, Link TM, Majumdar S. Advanced imaging of bone macro and micro structure. Bone. July 1999;25(1):149-152.
2006	van der Meulen MCH, Morgan TG, Yang X, Baldini TH, Myers ER, Wright TM, Bostrom MPG. Cancellous bone adaptation to in vivo loading in a rabbit model. Bone. June 2006;38(6):871-877.
2001	Niebur GL, Yuen JC, Burghardt AJ, Keaveny TM. Sensitivity of damage predictions to tissue level yield properties and apparent loading conditions. J Biomech. May 2001;34(5):699-706.
2009	Varga P, Baumbach S, Pahr D, Zysset PK. Validation of an anatomy specific finite element model of Colles’ fracture. J Biomech. August 7, 2009;42(11):1726-1731.
1999	Keaveny TM, Wachtel EF, Zadesky SP, Arramon YP. Application of the Tsai–Wu quadratic multiaxial failure criterion to bovine trabecular bone. J Biomech Eng. February 1999;121(1):99-107.
1999	Niebur GL, Yuen JC, Hsia AC, Keaveny TM. Convergence behavior of high-resolution finite element models of trabecular bone. J Biomech Eng. December 1999;121(6):629-635.
2004	Wang X, Liu X, Niebur GL. Preparation of on-axis cylindrical trabecular bone specimens using micro-CT imaging. J Biomech Eng. February 2004;126(1):122-125.
2021	Bennison MBL, Pilkey AK, Lievers WB. Misalignment error in cancellous bone apparent elastic modulus depends on bone volume fraction and degree of anisotropy. J Biomech Eng. February 2021;143(2):021005.
1999	Hildebrand T, Laib A, Müller R, Dequeker J, Rüegsegger P. Direct three-dimensional morphometric analysis of human cancellous bone: microstructural data from spine, femur, iliac crest, and calcaneus. J Bone Miner Res. July 1999;14(7):1167-1174.
2004	Ketcham RA, Ryan TM. Quantification and visualization of anisotropy in trabecular bone. J Microsc (Oxford). February 2004;213(2):158-171.
2000	Laib A, Barou O, Vico L, Lafage-Proust MH, Alexandre C, Rügsegger P. 3D micro-computed tomography of trabecular and cortical bone architecture with application to a rat model of immobilisation osteoporosis. Med Biol Eng Comput. May 2000;38(3):326-332.
2007	Cole JH. The Role of Architecture and Tissue Properties in the Structural Integrity of Human Vertebral Cancellous Bone [PhD thesis]. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University; May 2007.
2007	Kohler T. A Service-Oriented Platform for Visualization and High-Throughput Structural Characterization in Bone Phenomics [PhD thesis]. Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zürich; 2007.
2020	Bennison MBL. The Role of Cancellous Bone Architecture in Misalignment and Side Effect Errors [Master's thesis]. Sudbury, ON: Laurentian University; 2020.
2004	Wang X. Measurement and Analysis of Microdamage in Bone [PhD thesis]. University of Notre Dame; December 2004.
2009	Varga P. Prediction of Distal Radius Fracture Load Using HR-PQCT-Based Finite Element Analysis [PhD thesis]. Vienna University of Technology; December 2009.
2001	Boyd SK. Microstructural Bone Adaptation in an Experimental Model of Osteoarthritis [PhD thesis]. Calgary, AB: University of Calgary; January 2001.
2000	Niebur GL. A Computational Investigation of Multiaxial Failure in Trabecular Bone [PhD thesis]. Berkeley, CA: University of California; 2000.
2003	Fox JC. Biomechanics of the Proximal Femur: Role of Bone Distribution and Architecture [PhD thesis]. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley, University of California; 2003.