Vehicle occupants in far‐side oblique impacts are at risk of head and thorax injury due to impacts with interior structures and with near‐side occupants after slipping out of the shoulder belt. This study evaluated the effects of inflatable seat belts, along with inboard vs. outboard and B‐pillar vs. seat‐integrated shoulder‐belt anchorage locations, on Hybrid III and THOR‐ M dummy kinematics and injury metrics in simulated far‐side oblique crashes. Seven simulated crashes were conducted, with a 45° principal direction of force and a 55 km/h velocity change with 23 g peak acceleration. Shoulder‐belt upper anchorage location and belt type influenced the tendency for the dummy to slip out of the belt and subsequent occupant excursion. The inboard seat‐integrated inflatable belt restraint system had the greatest influence, eliminating Hybrid III shoulder‐belt slip out and decreasing excursion by 331 mm, compared with the conventional production B‐pillar‐mounted belt. The inflatable belt also showed potential to mitigate neck injuries, with low dummy injury metrics and distributed loading area.
Keywords:
Far‐side, Inflatable seat belts, Oblique impacts, Reverse geometry seat belts, Seat belts