Region specific viscoelastic properties of the adult rat brain under indentation following traumatic brain injury

Gabler, Lee F.; Stone, James R.; Mourad, Pierre D.; Crandall, Jeff R.; Salzar, Robert S.

Affiliations

¹Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Virginia’s Center for Applied Biomechanics, 4040 Lewis and Clark Drive, Charlottesville, VA 22911 USA

²Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia

³Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington

Abstract and keywords

Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) is a serious health epidemic that places high societal and economic burdens on victims and their caregivers. Further, the associated neuropathological consequences that result from TBI are often complex and cause secondary injuries that are focal, diffuse and time dependent. Current computational models can predict loading and deformation associated with TBI; however, accurate knowledge of region specific material properties from both healthy and mechanically damaged brain is needed. In this study, the mechanical properties of both uninjured and traumatically injured brain tissue are presented. Adult male Sprague‐Dawley rats were injured through a controlled cortical impact protocol. Ramp and hold indentation tests were performed at five locations on the surface of tissue samples excised from whole brain specimens. Force displacement data were analyzed using quasi‐linear viscoelastic theory. An analysis revealed the tissue to be viscoelastic and spatially nonlinear with mechanical properties that depend on both region and level of injury. After normalizing the data, the nonlinear components of the instantaneous elastic force and shear modulus were found to be significantly lower, 26%, in the region containing the contusion cavity on severely injured samples compared to uninjured tissue at the same region in controls.

Keywords:

Links

URL: http://www.ircobi.org/downloads/irc13/pdf_files/52.pdf

Cited Works (28)

Year	Entry
2006	Cater HL, Sundstrom LE, Morrison B III. Temporal development of hippocampal cell death is dependent on tissue strain but not strain rate. J Biomech. 2006;39(16):2810-2818.
1970	Estes MS, McElhaney JH. Response of brain tissue of compressive loading. ASME Biomechanical & Human Factors Conference; May 31–June 3, 1970; Washington, DC.1-4. ASME Publication 70-BHF-13.
2001	Darvish KK, Crandall JR. Nonlinear viscoelastic effects in oscillatory shear deformation of brain tissue. Med Eng Phys. 2001;23(9):633-645.
1943	Holbourn AHS. Mechanics of head injuries. Lancet. October 9, 1943;242(6267):438-441.
2003	Takhounts EG, Crandall JR, Darvish K. On the importance of nonlinearity of brain tissue under large deformations. Stapp Car Crash J. 2003;47:79-92. SAE 2003-22-0005.
2009	Shafieian M, Darvish KK, Stone JR. Changes to the viscoelastic properties of brain tissue after traumatic axonal injury. J Biomech. September 18, 2009;42(13):2136-2142.
1972	Hayes WC, Keer LM, Herrmann G, Mockros LF. A mathematical analysis for indentation tests of articular cartilage. J Biomech. September 1972;5(5):541-551.
1988	Lighthall JW. Controlled cortical impact: a new experimental brain injury model. J Neurotrauma. 1988;5(1):1-15.
2007	Elkin BS, Morrison B. Region-specific tolerance criteria for the living brain. Stapp Car Crash J. 2007;51:127-138. SAE 2007-22-0005.
1998	Thibault KL, Margulies SS. Age-dependent material properties of the porcine cerebrum: effect on pediatric inertial head injury criteria. J Biomech. December 1998;31(12):1119-1126.
1993	Mertz HJ. Anthropomorphic test devices. In: Nahum AM, Melvin JW, eds. Accidental Injury: Biomechanics and Prevention. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 1993:66-84.
1993	Fung YC. Biomechanics: Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 1993.
1994	Marmarou A, Foda MAA-E, van den Brink W, Campbell J, Kita H, Demetriadou K. A new model of diffuse brain injury in rats, I: pathophysiology and biomechanics. J Neurosurg. February 1994;80(2):291-300.
1972	Shuck LZ, Advani SH. Rheological response of human brain tissue in shear. J Basic Eng. December 1972;94(4):905-911.
1965	Sneddon IN. The relation between load and penetration in the axisymmetric Boussinesq problem for a punch of arbitrary profile. Int J Eng Sci. May 1965;3(1):47-57.
1998	Arbogast KB, Margulies SS. Material characterization of the brainstem from oscillatory shear tests. J Biomech. September 1998;31(9):801-807.
2012	Finan JD, Pearson EM, Morrison B III. Viscoelastic properties of the rat brain in the horizontal plane. In: Proceedings of the 2012 International IRCOBI Conference on the Biomechanics of Injury. September 12-14, 2012; Dublin, Ireland.474-485.
2008	Owens BD, Kragh JF Jr, Wenke JC, Macaitis J, Wade CE, Holcomb JB. Combat wounds in Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom. J Trauma. February 2008;64(2):295-299.
2000	Bain AC, Meaney DF. Tissue-level thresholds for axonal damage in an experimental model of central nervous system white matter injury. J Biomech Eng. December 2000;122(6):615-622.
1997	Arbogast KB, Thibault KL, Pinheiro BS, Winey KI, Margulies SS. A high-frequency shear device for testing soft biological tissues. J Biomech. 1997;30(7):757-759.
2002	Prange MT, Margulies SS. Regional, directional, and age-dependent properties of the brain undergoing large deformation. J Biomech Eng. 2002;124(2):244-252.
2010	Faul M, Xu L, Wald MM, Coronado VG. Traumatic Brain Injury in the United States: Emergency Department Visits, Hospitalizations and Deaths 2002–2006. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control; March 2010.
1970	Galford JE, McElhaney JH. A viscoelastic study of scalp, brain, and dura. J Biomech. 1970;3(2):211-221.
2003	Morrison B III, Cater HL, Wang CC-B, Thomas FC, Hung CT, Ateshian GA, Sundstrom LE. A tissue level tolerance criterion for living brain developed with an in vitro model of traumatic mechanical loading. Stapp Car Crash J. 2003;47:93-105. SAE 2003-22-0006.
2004	Gefen A, Margulies SS. Are in vivo and in situ brain tissues mechanically similar? J Biomech. September 2004;37(9):1339-1352.
1976	McElhaney JH, Roberts VL, Hilyard JF. Handbook of Human Tolerance. Tokyo, Japan: Japan Automobile Research Institute (JARI) Inc; 1976.
2007	Hardy WN, Mason MJ, Foster CD, Shah CS, Kopacz JM, Yang KH, King AI, Bishop J, Bey M, Anderst W, Tashman S. A study of the response of the human cadaver head to impact. Stapp Car Crash J. 2007;51:17-80. SAE 2007-22-0002.
2006	Hrapko M, van Dommelen J, Peters GWM, Wismans JSHM. The mechanical behaviour of brain tissue: large strain response and constitutive modelling. Biorheology. 2006;43(5):623-636.

Cited By (2)

Year	Entry
2015	Alshareef AA, Gabler LF, Stone JR, Panzer MB. Changes in the mechanical response of brain tissue following primary blast injury. In: Proceedings of the 11th Ohio State University Injury Biomechanics Symposium. May 17-19, 2015; Columbus, OH.
2016	Antona-Makoshi J. Traumatic Brain Injuries: Animal Experiments and Numerical Simulations to Support the Development of a Brain Injury Criterion [PhD thesis]. Götenburg, Sweden: Chalmers University of Technology; 2016.