Comparison of modeling techniques for flexible dummy parts

Koppens, W. P.; Lupker, H. A.; Rademaker, C. W.

Affiliations

Abstract

An important requisite for an effective use of numerical tools in occupant safety assessment is that suitable models of crash victims are available. Reliable well validated multibody models of several crash dummies have been developed in the last two decades. Flexible parts are modeled as rigid bodies interconnected by joints that account for the flexibility. Recently the finite element method has been used for modeling such parts. In this paper an alternative method is proposed namely as a flexible body with distributed mass and stiffness.

To evaluate these methods, three models of a rib module of a EUROSID-1 dummy are compared with the rib modeled as:

a chain of nine rigid bodies interconnected by revolute joints, and torsional springs and dampers,

one flexible body with the deformation approximated by one predefined displacement mode,

a finite element model using triangular shell elements with a linear elastic material behavior and mass proportional Rayleigh damping.

The numerical results are validated using EUROSID-1 rib module lateral and oblique impactor tests. In these tests the rib module is fixed vertically on one end and the other end is impacted by a falling mass. The models are evaluated with respect to their modeling capabilities and computational efficiency.

It is concluded that the three models can be used to analyze impacts from relevant directions. The displacement modes for the flexible body model can be obtained from finite element analyses or from experiments. The latter approach does not require a detailed description of the flexible structure and its material behavior. The finite element model requires considerably more computation time as compared to the multibody models.

Links

DOI: 10.4271/933116

SAE: 933116

Cited By (7)

Year	Entry
1994	Jansen STH, Lupker HA. Fuel truck roll-over simulation. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV). May 23-26, 1994; Munich, Germany.1574-1582.
2001	Kent R, Sieveka E, Crandall J. Parametric study of side impact thoracic injury criteria using the MADYMO human body model. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV). June 4-7, 2001; Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
2001	Verhoeve R, Kant R, Margerie L. Advances in numerical modelling of crash dummies. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV). June 4-7, 2001; Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
1996	Fountain M, Happee R, Wismans J, Lupker H, Koppens W. Hybrid modelling of crash dummies for numerical simulation. In: Proceedings of the 1996 International IRCOBI Conference on the Biomechanics of Impact. September 11-13, 1996; Dublin, Ireland.401-420.
2000	Happee R, Ridella S, Nayef A, Morsink P, de Lange R, Bours R, van Hoof J. Mathematical human body models representing a mid size male and a small female for frontal, lateral and rearward impact loading. In: Proceedings of the 2000 International IRCOBI Conference on the Biomechanics of Impact. September 20-22, 2000; Montpellier, France.67-84.
2005	Hovenga PE, Spit HH, Uijldert M, Dalenoort AM. Improved prediction of Hybrid-III injury values using advanced multibody techniques and objective rating. In: Proceedings of the SAE World Congress & Exhibition. April 11-14, 2005; Detroit, MI. Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers. SAE 2005-01-1307.
1994	Fountain M, Altamore P, Skarakis J, Spiess O. Mathematical modelling of the BIOSID dummy. In: Proceedings of the 38th Stapp Car Crash Conference. October 31–November 2, 1994; Fort Lauderdale, FL. Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers:309-323. SAE 942226.