In frontal impact, thorax and head injuries have strongly decreased with the development of occupant restraining systems including airbags, belt load limiters, and pretensioning systems. Nevertheless, the protection of abdomen and lower limbs has still to be improved, especially in rear seats. Indeed, car stiffness has increased in order to keep enough survival space for severe crashes. Thus, car manufacturers have developed specific restraint devices to improve protection of pelvis and lumbar spine, with prevention of submarining. One of these consists of an anti-sliding system based on an inflatable metallic wrap.
The main goal of the study was to investigate the risk of injury with a prototype of such a device, in case of static deployment, for in-position and out-of-position situations. Because the lack of relevance of the dummies in such conditions is suspected, and because criteria do not currently exist as far as the lumbar spine is concerned, six cadaver tests, including three in out-of-position situation, were carried out and duplicated with small female, and 50th male HIII dummies. Two inflators were used.
Cadavers were instrumented with linear accelerometers and angular velocity sensors for vertebra L2, L3, L5 and sacrum. The seat was equipped with load cells.
For the six cadaver tests, no injury was observed. Intervertebral rotation values are given for the cadavers and lumbar spine forces and moments recorded on dummies are presented. Comparisons regarding lumbar spine kinematics are realized for biofidelity assessment.
|1970||Yamada H. Strength of Biological Materials. Evans FG, ed. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins Company; 1970.|
|1977||Kazarian L, Graves GA Jr. Compressive strength characteristics of the human vertebral centrum. Spine. March 1977;2(1):1-14.|
|1994||Myers BS, Arbogast KB, Lobaugh B, Harper KD, Richardson WJ, Drezner MK. Improved assessment of lumbar vertebral body strength using supine lateral dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry. J Bone Miner Res. May 1994;9(5):687-693.|
|1984||Willén J, Lindahl S, Irstam L, Aldman B, Nordwall A. The thoracolumbar crush fracture an experimental study on instant axial dynamic loading: the resulting fracture type and its stability. Spine. September 1984;9(6):624-631.|
|1998||Demetropoulos CK, Yang KH, Grimm MJ, Khalil TB, King AI. Mechanical properties of the cadaveric and Hybrid III lumbar spines. In: Proceedings of the 42nd Stapp Car Crash Conference. November 2-4, 1998; Tempa, AZ. Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers:237-. SAE 983160.|
|1988||Yoganandan N, Myklebust JB, Cusick JF, Wilson CR, Sances A Jr. Functional biomechanics of the thoracolumbar vertebral cortex. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). February 1988;3(1):11-18.|
|1983||Myklebust J, Sances A, Maiman D, Pintar F, Chilbert M, Rauschning W, Larson S, Cusick J, Ewing C, Thomas D, Saltzberg B. Experimental spinal trauma studies in the human and monkey cadaver. In: Proceedings of the 27th Stapp Car Crash Conference. October 17-19, 1983; San Diego, CA. Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers:149-161. SAE 831614.|
|1989||Brinckmann P, Biggemann M, Hilweg D. Prediction of the compressive strength of human lumbar vertebrae. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1989;4(suppl 2):S1-S27.|
|2013||Zhang N, Zhao J. Study of compression-related lumbar spine fracture criteria using a full body FE human model. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV). May 27-30, 2013; Seoul, South Korea.|
|2017||Mroz K, Pipkorn B, Kim HJ, Crandall J. Investigation of pelvis kinematics for various lap belt positions and an inflatable pelvis restraint cushion using a human body model of a female occupant. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV). June 5-8, 2017; Detroit, MI.|
|2012||Beck B. Optimising Protection for Motor Vehicle Rear Seat Occupants [PhD thesis]. University of New South Wales; 2012.|