Influence of orthogonal overload on human vertebral trabecular bone mechanical properties

wbldb

Badiei, Arash; Bottema, Murk J.; Fazzalari, Nicola L.

Influence of orthogonal overload on human vertebral trabecular bone mechanical properties

J Bone Miner Res. 2007;22(11):1690-1699

Abstract and keywords

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of overload in orthogonal directions on longitudinal and transverse mechanical integrity in human vertebral trabecular bone. Results suggest that the trabecular structure has properties that act to minimize the decrease of apparent toughness transverse to the primary loading direction.

Introduction: The maintenance of mechanical integrity and function of trabecular structure after overload remains largely unexplored. Whereas a number of studies have focused on addressing the question by testing the principal anatomical loading direction, the mechanical anisotropy has been overlooked. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of overload in orthogonal directions on longitudinal and transverse mechanical integrity in human vertebral trabecular bone.

Materials and Methods: T₁₂/L₁ vertebral bodies from five cases and L₄/L₅ vertebral bodies from seven cases were retrieved at autopsy. A cube of trabecular bone was cut from the centrum of each vertebral body and imaged by μCT. Cubes from each T₁₂/L₁ and L₄/L₅ pairs were assigned to either superoinferior (SI) or anteroposterior (AP) mechanical testing groups. All samples were mechanically tested to 10% apparent strain by uniaxial compression according to their SI or AP allocation. To elucidate the extent to which overload in orthogonal directions affects the mechanical integrity of the trabecular structure, samples were retested (after initial uniaxial compression) in their orthogonal direction. After mechanical testing in each direction, apparent ultimate failure stresses (UFS), apparent elastic moduli (E), and apparent toughness moduli (u) were computed.

Results: Significant differences in mechanical properties were found between SI and AP directions in both first and second overload tests. Mechanical anisotropy far exceeded differences resulting from overloading the structure in the orthogonal direction. No significant differences were found in mean UFS and mean u for the first or second overload tests. A significant decrease of 35% was identified in mean E for cubes overloaded in the SI direction and then overloaded in the AP direction.

Conclusions: Observed differences in the mechanics of trabecular structure after overload suggests that the trabecular structure has properties that act to minimize loss of apparent toughness, perhaps through energy dissipating sacrificial structures transverse to the primary loading direction.

Keywords: bone mechanics; bone quality; trabecular bone architecture; bone strength; vertebral bone
Links

DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.070706

PubMed: 17620053

WoS: 000250768200008

Cited Works (35)

Year	Entry
1967	Atkinson PJ. Variation in trabecular structure of vertebrae with age. Calcif Tiss Res. December 1967;1(1):24-32.
2002	Currey JD. Bones: Structure and Mechanics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2002.
2002	Thomsen JS, Ebbesen EN, Mosekilde L. Predicting human vertebral bone strength by vertebral static histomorphometry. Bone. March 2002;30(3):502-508.
1997	Keaveny TM, Pinilla TP, Crawford RP, Kopperdahl DL, Lou A. Systematic and random errors in compression testing of trabecular bone [published correction appears in J Orthop Res. 1995;17(1):151]. J Orthop Res. 1997;15(1):101-110.
1994	Goulet RW, Goldstein SA, Ciarelli MJ, Kuhn JL, Brown MB, Feldkamp LA. The relationship between the structural and orthogonal compressive properties of trabecular bone. J Biomech. April 1994;27(4):375-389.
2001	Turner CH, Burr DB. Experimental techniques for bone mechanics. In: Cowin SC, ed. Bone Mechanics Handbook. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2001:chap 7.
1999	Keaveny TM, Wachtel EF, Kopperdahl DL. Mechanical behavior of human trabecular bone after overloading. J Orthop Res. May 1999;17(3):346-353.
2002	Turner CH. Biomechanics of bone: determinants of skeletal fragility and bone quality. Osteoporos Int. February 2002;13(2):97-104.
1999	Cendre E, Mitton D, Roux J-P, Arlot ME, Duboeuf F, Burt-Pichat B, Rumelhart C, Peix G, Meunier PJ. High-resolution computed tomography for architectural characterization of human lumbar cancellous bone: relationships with histomorphometry and biomechanics. Osteoporos Int. 1999;10(5):353-360.
1986	Mosekilde L, Mosekilde L. Normal vertebral body size and compressive strength: relations to age and to vertebral and iliac trabecular bone compressive strength. Bone. 1986;7(3):207-212.
1987	Mosekilde L, Mosekilde L, Danielsen CC. Biomechanical competence of vertebral trabecular bone in relation to ash density and age in normal individuals. Bone. 1987;8(2):79-85.
2000	Kopperdahl DL, Pearlman JL, Keaveny TM. Biomechanical consequences of an isolated overload on the human vertebral body. J Orthop Res. September 2000;18(5):685-690.
1985	Mosekilde L, Viidik A, Mosekilde L. Correlation between the compressive strength of iliac and vertebral trabecular bone in normal individuals. Bone. 1985;6(5):291-295.
1994	Müller R, Hildebrand T, Rüegsegger P. Non-invasive bone biopsy: a new method to analyse and display the three-dimensional structure of trabecular bone. Phys Med Biol. January 1994;39(1):145-164.
1995	Müller R, Rüegsegger P. Three-dimensional finite element modelling of non-invasively assessed trabecular bone structures. Med Eng Phys. March 1995;17(2):126-133.
2001	Keaveny TM, Morgan EF, Niebur GL, Yeh OC. Biomechanics of trabecular bone. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2001;3:307-333.
1997	Hildebrand T, Rüegsegger P. Quantification of bone microarchitecture with the structure model index. Comput Methods Prog Biomed. 1997;1(1):15-23.
2006	Wang X, Niebur GL. Microdamage propagation in trabecular bone due to changes in loading mode. J Biomech. 2006;39(5):781-790.
2005	Wang X, Guyette J, Liu X, Roeder RK, Niebur GL. Axial-shear interaction effects on microdamage in bovine tibial trabecular bone. Euro J Morphol. February–April 2005;42(1-2):61-70.
2001	Odgaard A. Quantification of cancellous bone architecture. In: Cowin SC, ed. Bone Mechanics Handbook. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2001:chap 14.
1994	Keaveny TM, Wachtel EF, Guo XE, Hayes WC. Mechanical behavior of damaged trabecular bone. J Biomech. November 1994;27(11):1309-1318.
1981	Hansson T, Roos B. Microcalluses of the trabeculae in lumbar vertebrae and their relation to the bone mineral content. Spine. July–August 1981;6(4):375-380.
1987	Hansson TH, Keller TS, Panjabi MM. A study of the compressive properties of lumbar vertebral trabeculae: effects of tissue characteristics. Spine. January–February 1987;12(1):56-62.
1997	Hildebrand T, Rüegsegger P. A new method for the model-independent assessment of thickness in three-dimensional images. J Microsc (Oxford). 1997;185(1):67-75.
1979	Otsu N. A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE Trans Sys Man Cyb. 1979;9(1):62-66.
1970	Galante J, Rostoker W, Ray RD. Physical properties of trabecular bone. Calcif Tiss Res. 1970;5(1):236-246.
1988	Mosekilde L. Age-related changes in vertebral trabecular bone architecture—assessed by a new method. Bone. 1988;9(4):247-250.
1998	Fazzalari NL, Forwood MR, Smith K, Manthey BA, Herreen P. Assessment of cancellous bone quality in severe osteoarthrosis: bone mineral density, mechanics, and microdamage. Bone. 1998;22(4):381-388.
1999	Hildebrand T, Laib A, Müller R, Dequeker J, Rüegsegger P. Direct three-dimensional morphometric analysis of human cancellous bone: microstructural data from spine, femur, iliac crest, and calcaneus. J Bone Miner Res. July 1999;14(7):1167-1174.
1993	Odgaard A, Gundersen HJG. Quantification of connectivity in cancellous bone, with special emphasis on 3-D reconstructions. Bone. March–April 1993;14(2):173-182.
1999	Ulrich D, van Rietbergen B, Laib A, Rüegsegger P. The ability of three-dimensional structural indices to reflect mechanical aspects of trabecular bone. Bone. 1999;25(1):55-60.
1997	Odgaard A. Three-dimensional methods for quantification of cancellous bone architecture. Bone. 1997;20(4):315-328.
1994	Fyhrie DP, Schaffler MB. Failure mechanisms in human vertebral cancellous bone. Bone. 1994;15(1):105-109.
1992	Hahn M, Vogel M, Pompesius-Kempa M, Delling G. Trabecular bone pattern factor: a new parameter for simple quantification of bone microarchitecture. Bone. 1992;13(4):327-330.
1993	Keaveny TM, Hayes WC. A 20-year perspective on the mechanical properties of trabecular bone. J Biomech Eng. November 1993;115(4B):534-542.

Cited By (12)

Year	Entry
2009	Shi X, Wang X, Niebur GL. Effects of loading orientation on the morphology of the predicted yielded regions in trabecular bone. Ann Biomed Eng. 2009;37(2):354-362.
2009	Garrison JG, Slaboch CL, Niebur GL. Density and architecture have greater effects on the toughness of trabecular bone than damage. Bone. May 2009;44(5):924-929.
2018	Zhao S, Arnold M, Ma S, Abel RL, Cobb JP, Hansen U, Boughton O. Standardizing compression testing for measuring the stiffness of human bone. Bone Joint Res. August 2018;7(8):524-538.
2010	Shi X, Liu XS, Wang X, Guo XE, Niebur GL. Type and orientation of yielded trabeculae during overloading of trabecular bone along orthogonal directions. J Biomech. September 17, 2010;43(13):2460-2466.
2011	Green JO, Wang J, Diab T, Vidakovic B, Guldberg RE. Age-related differences in the morphology of microdamage propagation in trabecular bone. J Biomech. October 13, 2011;44(15):2659-2666.
2011	Garrison JG, Gargac JA, Niebur GL. Shear strength and toughness of trabecular bone are more sensitive to density than damage. J Biomech. November 10, 2011;44(16):2747-2754.
2010	Barak MM, Weiner S, Shahar R. The contribution of trabecular bone to the stiffness and strength of rat lumbar vertebrae. Spine. October 2010;35(22):E1153-E1159.
2021	Golman M. Toughening Mechanisms for the Attachment of Architectured Materials: The Mechanics of the Tendon Enthesis [PhD thesis]. Columbia University; 2021.
2011	O'Neal JM. The Effects of Aging and Remodeling on Bone Quality and Microdamage [PhD thesis]. Atlanta, GA: Georgia Institute of Technology; August 2011.
2010	Shi X. Effects of Architecture on Microdamage Susceptibility in Trabecular Bone [PhD thesis]. University of Notre Dame; April 2010.
2011	Garrison JG. The Relative Importance of Stress State, Microarchitecture, and Damage Burden in the Failure Behavior of Trabecular Bone [PhD thesis]. University of Notre Dame; April 2011.
2012	Barkaoui A. Modélisation multiéchelle du comportement mécano-biologique de l’os humain: De l’ultrastructure au remodelage osseux [PhD thesis]. University of Orleans; 2012.