Quantitative Imaging of Cartilage and Meniscus for Detection of Early Osteoarthritic Degeneration

Links

URL: http://purl.stanford.edu/dn309qn4326

Abstract

Osteoarthritis is a prevalent disease that results in pain and loss of mobility of the joints. Knee osteoarthritis in particular affects an estimated 37 % of the population over 60 years of age. Osteoarthritis of the knee is typically diagnosed with a weight-bearing radiograph following symptomatic knee pain. Unfortunately, by this point osteoarthritis has usually reached an advanced stage. There are no current cures for osteoarthritis, but to allow for development of disease-modifying treatments it is necessary to develop and validate methods that can reliably detect the earliest osteoarthritic changes.

The first part of this dissertation explores the use of an upright weight-bearing computed tomography (CT) system used in conjunction with an intra-articular contrast injection to track cartilage deformation while a person stands for an extended period of time. The rate of cartilage deformation over time has the potential to be an early marker for osteoarthritic change in the knee, however a major challenge in this project is the time it takes to manually segment the 3D CT images. Chapter 3 describes the development of an automated segmentation method to eliminate the manual cartilage segmentation process. The results show that the automated approach is extremely consistent with the manual results, and importantly could allow for completion of similar studies of cartilage deformation much faster, and with a reduction in subjective user-input.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has high potential for detecting early osteoarthritis due to its excellent soft tissue contrast and ability to measure quantitative relaxation times, such as T2 and T1ρ, which are generally considered to be related to collagen and proteoglycan content, respectively. Ideally, by tracking changes in T2 and T1ρ, the degenerative state of cartilage and meniscus could be determined. Ex situ imaging is often necessary to correlate quantitative MRI metrics with mechanical and biochemical properties of tissue to fully understand what the imaging metrics mean. Unfortunately, in the literature there is a wide variety of approaches for imaging tissue ex situ, which may adversely affect the quantitative metrics. Chapter 4 of this dissertation investigates the use of 5 different substances for immersing cartilage and meniscus tissue in during ex situ imaging, and if they affect quantitative MRI relaxation times relative to in situ and in vivo results. The results of this study show the benefits of using peanut oil for ex situ imaging of cartilage and meniscus tissue for T2 relaxation times in particular. Chapter 5 uses the results of this work in an attempt to correlate T2 relaxation times of cartilage retrieved from knee joint replacement subjects with the equilibrium compressive modulus and water content. Even with advanced imaging methods for T2 relaxation times and the improved ex situ environment, correlations were not clear between T2 relaxation times and the equilibrium compressive modulus or water content of cartilage.

Although T2 relaxation times have been shown to generally increase with osteoarthritis, the variation in T2 relaxation times in all states of cartilage health makes it challenging to use the absolute value as a metric for cartilage health. In Chapter 6, an ACL-injured population is used to investigate changes to cartilage using MRI over 18-months postsurgery. ACL-injured subjects are ideal for studying osteoarthritis due to their substantially increased risk of osteoarthritis and known point of traumatic injury. A cluster analysis approach, which looks at regions of elevated T2 relaxation times in cartilage between MRI scan time-points showed that ACL-injured subjects exhibited significantly higher regions of T2 clusters compared to a control group just 3-months following their baseline MRI scan, and these changes persisted at 18-months post-baseline. The results from this study suggest that the T2 cluster analysis might be ideal for detecting cartilage changes, and potentially more sensitive for detecting cartilage degeneration than relying on absolute values of T2 relaxation times.

Overall, the work from this dissertation progresses the application of imaging for understanding early osteoarthritis by focusing on both CT, MRI and the development of advanced imaging analysis techniques.

Cited Works (25)

Year	Entry
1982	Armstrong CG, Mow VC. Variations in the intrinsic mechanical properties of human articular cartilage with age, degeneration, and water content. J Bone Joint Surg. 1982;64A(1):88-94.
2011	Makris EA, Hadidi P, Athanasiou KA. The knee meniscus: structure–function, pathophysiology, current repair techniques, and prospects for regeneration. Biomaterials. October 2011;32(30):7411-7431.
1983	Grood ES, Suntay WJ. A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee. J Biomech Eng. May 1983;105(2):136-144.
1999	Setton LA, Elliott D., Mow VC. Altered mechanics of cartilage with osteoarthritis: human osteoarthritis and an experimental model of joint degeneration. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. January 1999;7(1):2-14.
2001	Chen SS, Falcovitz YH, Schneiderman R, Maroudas A, Sah RL. Depth-dependent compressive properties of normal aged human femoral head articular cartilage: relationship to fixed charge density. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. August 2001;9(6):561-569.
1987	Felson DT, Naimark A, Anderson J, Kazis L, Castelli W, Meenan RF. The prevalence of knee osteoarthritis in the elderly: the Framingham Osteoarthritis Study. Arthritis Rheum. August 1987;30(8):914-918.
1971	Hayes WC, Mockros LF. Viscoelastic properties of human articular cartilage. J Appl Physiol. October 1971;31(4):562-568.
2011	Anderson DD, Chubinskaya S, Guilak F, Martin JA, Oegema TR, Olson SA, Buckwalter JA. Post-traumatic osteoarthritis: improved understanding and opportunities for early intervention. J Orthop Res. June 2011;29(6):802-809.
2006	Brown TD, Johnston RC, Saltzman CL, Marsh JL, Buckwalter JA. Posttraumatic osteoarthritis: a first estimate of incidence, prevalence, and burden of disease. J Orthop Trauma. November–December 2006;20(10):739-744.
1980	Fukubayashi T, Kurosawa H. The contact area and pressure distribution pattern of the knee: a study of normal and osteoarthrotic knee joints. Acta Orthop Scand. December 1980;51(5):871-879.
2010	Kutzner I, Heinlein B, Graichen F, Bender A, Rohlmann A, Halder A, Beier A, Bergmann G. Loading of the knee joint during activities of daily living measured in vivo in five subjects. J Biomech. August 10, 2010;43(11):2164-2173.
2002	Korhonen RK, Laasanen MS, Töyräs J, Rieppo J, Hirvonen J, Helminen HJ, Jurvelin JS. Comparison of the equilibrium response of articular cartilage in unconfined compression, confined compression and indentation. J Biomech. July 2002;35(7):903-909.
1957	Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS. Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis. December 1957;16(4):494-502.
2005	Roos EM. Joint injury causes knee osteoarthritis in young adults. Curr Opin Rhuematol. March 2005;17(2):195-200.
1990	Fithian DC, Kelly MA, Mow VC. Material properties and structure-function relationships in the menisci. Clin Orthop Relat Res. March 1990;252:19-31.
1995	Arendt E, Dick R. Knee injury patterns among men and women in collegiate basketball and soccer: NCAA data and review of literature. Am J Sports Med. December 1995;23(6):694-701.
1999	Cohen ZA, McCarthy DM, Kwak SD, Legrand P, Fogarasi F, Ciaccio EJ, Ateshian GA. Knee cartilage topography, thickness, and contact areas from MRI: in-vitro calibration and in-vivo measurements. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. January 1999;7(1):95-109.
2012	Loeser RF, Goldring SR, Scanzello CR, Goldring MB. Osteoarthritis: a disease of the joint as an organ. Arthritis Rheum. June 2012;64(6):1697-1707.
1997	Schinagl RM, Gurskis D, Chen AC, Sah RL. Depth-dependent confined compression modulus of full-thickness bovine articular cartilage. J Orthop Res. July 1997;15(4):499-506.
2006	Pritzker KPH, Gay S, Jimenez SA, Ostergaard K, Pelletier J-P, Revell PA, Salter D, van den Berg WB. Osteoarthritis cartilage histopathology: grading and staging. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. January 2006;14(1):13-29.
1991	Athanasiou KA, Rosenwasser MP, Buckwalter JA, Malinin TI, Mow VC. Interspecies comparisons of in situ intrinsic mechanical properties of distal femoral cartilage. J Orthop Res. May 1991;9(3):330-340.
1998	Messner K, Gao J. The menisci of the knee joint: anatomical and functional characteristics, and a rationale for clinical treatment. J Anat. August 1998;193(2):161-178.
2011	Bijlsma JW, Berenbaum F, Lafeber FP. Osteoarthritis: an update with relevance for clinical practice. Lancet. June 18, 2011;377(9783):2115-2126.
2004	Park S, Hung CT, Ateshian GA. Mechanical response of bovine articular cartilage under dynamic unconfined compression loading at physiological stress levels. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. January 2004;12(1):65-73.
2009	Fox AJS, Bedi A, Rodeo SA. The basic science of articular cartilage: structure, composition, and function. Sports Health. November–December 2009;1(6):461-468.