Historically, the rear-impact mode has received most attention in the context of low-speed rearend crashes, but in the future of automated vehicles (AV), the rear-impact mode may occur at higher speed in frontal crashes with a rearward-facing seating configuration. While the use of human body models (HBM) in virtual testing for AV is expected, current HBMs have never been validated in moderate/high-speed rear impacts. The objective of this study is to evaluate the biofidelity of the Global Human Body Models Consortium average male occupant detailed and simplified HBMs by using biomechanical targets generated from a series of post mortem human surrogates rear-impact tests at two severities (17 km/h; 24 km/h) with an experimental sled system, which mimics the dynamic characteristics of a modern vehicle seatback. The NHTSA Biofidelity Ranking System was used to evaluate the HBMs. The HBMs exhibited better biofidelity 1) at 17 km/h than 24 km/h, and 2) in the head to T1 region, which is relevant to rear-impact-related injuries, than the T1 to pelvis region. The detailed HBM received a better biofidelity score than the simplified HBM in every studied component. Limitations for the HBMs’ biofidelity were indicated in the modelling of their spines and surrounding flesh.
Keywords:
Biofidelity; Experimental sled system; Human body model; Post mortem human subject; Rear impact