Transfer of the external loading such as shock or vibration to whole body could cause harmful or beneficial effects, depending on its nature. Two contradicting effects were investigated with macro and micro scale. In macro scale, the vibration absorbing capability of the human foot and ankle system (FAS) was investigated as the starting point of the whole body vibration using experimental method (transmissibility and phase delay measurement) and a model development. For biological cells, Finite Element modeling was utilized for modal analysis of an adherent cell in micro scale.
Vibration transfer characteristics of the FAS have been studied under vertical sinusoidal vibration (10-50 Hz with 5 Hz increments and 17.9 m/s² (peak to peak)) as a function of the external mass and foot and ankle postures. The results showed that the FAS played an important role in vibration transmission since the transmissibility of the FAS was dominant in lower leg. It was also found that the applied mass made the system stiffer and less damping, and the increase of the applied mass led to the increase of the resonant frequency from 20 to 30-40 Hz. This result explains that the overweight or obese persons can get more vibration transmission to the whole body when they are exposed to higher frequency (30-40 Hz). Furthermore, it supports that the resonant frequency of overweight or obese persons is similar to a major frequency range of heel strike, and overweight and obesity could be a potential injurious effect.
As the beginning step of a model development, system identification based on black box models (linear polynomial structures and state-space models) was utilized for understanding the transfer function on the basis of the acceleration measurement data of the foot and ankle exposed to vertical excitation. The identification of black box models showed good estimation results (60-98 %). The fitting error of the lower frequency (10 and 15 Hz regardless of the applied mass conditions) was observed because of nonlinear behavior of the viscoelastic material of the foot and ankle system. The identified statespace model gave the guide for order selection (2-8) of the grey box model in the next step.
The dynamic model of the foot and ankle exposed to vertical vibrations has been developed by deriving analytical dynamic equations that include viscoelastic material properties. Using parameter sensitivity analysis with respect to the states, complex derived equations were simplified as a two degrees of freedom model with linear spring and nonlinear damping at the fat pad and talocrural joint. Unknown parameters of the dynamic model were estimated by the parameter estimation method (optimization algorithm) by fitting the experimental data. The estimated parameters demonstrated that the fat pad dissipated more energy of the applied vibration than the talocrural joint and the applied mass and frequency increase affected the stiffness increase at the ankle joint and fat pad. The derived model is expected to be utilized for estimating some other frequencies and loading conditions.
An adherent single cell was modeled as a simple dome to extract the natural frequency and mode shapes of a cell in the culturing environment using Finite Element modal analysis. Simulation results showed that the adhered cell shape did not affect the modal analysis results. However the natural frequency was increased proportionally to the increase in Young’s modulus. It is supposed that the natural frequency of cells (18-25 Hz) is closely related to the optimal vibration range (20-60 Hz) for bone growth.
|2004||Verschueren SMP, Roelants M, Delecluse C, Swinnen S, Vanderschueren D, Boonen S. Effect of 6‐month whole body vibration training on hip density, muscle strength, and postural control in postmenopausal women: a randomized controlled pilot study. J Bone Miner Res. March 2004;19(3):352-359.|
|2000||Brown TD. Techniques for mechanical stimulation of cells in vitro: a review. J Biomech. January 2000;33(1):3-14.|
|1998||Matsumoto Y, Griffin MJ. Dynamic response of the standing human body exposed to vertical vibration: influence of posture and vibration magnitude. J Sound Vibrat. April 23, 1998;212(1):85-107.|
|2005||Cheung JT-M, Zhang M, Leung AK-L, Fan Y-B. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the foot during standing—a material sensitivity study. J Biomech. 2005;38(5):1045-1054.|
|2007||Ledoux WR, Blevins JJ. The compressive material properties of the plantar soft tissue. J Biomech. 2007;40(13):2975-2981.|
|1986||Panjabi MM, Andersson GB, Jorneus L, Hult E, Mattsson L. In vivo measurements of spinal column vibrations. J Bone Joint Surg. June 1986;68A(5):695-702.|
|1998||Wei L, Griffin MJ. Mathematical models for the apparent mass of the seated human body exposed to vertical vibration. J Sound Vibrat. May 21, 1998;212(5):855-874.|
|2006||Actis RL, Ventura LB, Smith KE, Commean PK, Lott DJ, Pilgram TK, Mueller MJ. Numerical simulation of the plantar pressure distribution in the diabetic foot during the push-off stance. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2006;44(8):653-663.|
|2003||Gefen A. The in vivo elastic properties of the plantar fascia during the contact phase of walking. Foot Ankle Int. March 2003;24(3):238-244.|
|2000||Gefen A, Megido-Ravid M, Itzchak Y, Arcan M. Biomechanical analysis of the three-dimensional foot structure during gait: a basic tool for clinical applications. J Biomech Eng. December 2000;122(6):630-639.|
|1969||Isman RE, Inman VT. Anthropometric studies of the human foot and ankle. Bull Prosthet Res. Spring, 1969;10-11:97-129.|
|1994||Kim W, Voloshin AS, Johnson SH. Modeling of heel strike transients during running. Hum Mov Sci. June 1994;13(2):221-244.|
|1990||Bennett MB, Ker RF. The mechanical properties of the human subcalcaneal fat pad in compression. J Anat. August 1990;171:131-138.|
|2002||Miller-Young JE, Duncan NA, Baroud G. Material properties of the human calcaneal fat pad in compression: experiment and theory. J Biomech. December 2002;35(12):1523-1531.|
|1984||Radin EL, Martin RB, Burr DB, Caterson B, Boyd RD, Goodwin C. Effects of mechanical loading on the tissues of the rabbit knee. J Orthop Res. 1984;2(3):221-234.|
|1987||Ker RF, Bennett MB, Bibby SR, Kester RC, Alexander RM. The spring in the arch of the human foot. Nature. January 8, 1987;325(6100):147-149.|
|1987||Hinz B, Seidel H. The nonlinearity of the human body's dynamic response during sinusoidal whole body vibration. Ind Health. 1987;25(4):169-181.|
|1993||Scott SH, Winter DA. Biomechanical model of the human foot: kinematics and kinetics during the stance phase of walking. J Biomech. 1993;26(9):1091-1104.|
|1998||Matsumoto Y, Griffin M. Movement of the upper-body of seated subjects exposed to vertical whole-body vibration at the principal resonance frequency. J Sound Vibrat. August 27, 1998;215(4):743-762.|
|2001||Gefen A, Megido-Ravid M, Itzchak Y. In vivo biomechanical behavior of the human heel pad during the stance phase of gait. J Biomech. 2001;34(12):1661-1665.|
|1998||Paddan GS, Griffin MJ. A review of the transmission of translational seat vibration to the head. J Sound Vibrat. August 27, 1998;215(4):863-882.|
|1964||Wright DG, Rennels DC. A study of the elastic properties of plantar fascia. J Bone Joint Surg. 1964;46A(3):482-492.|
|1998||Harazin B, Grzesik J. The transmission of vertical whole-body vibration to the body segments of standing subjects. J Sound Vibrat. 1998;215(4):775-787.|
|2008||Kiiski J, Heinonen A, Järvinen TL, Kannus P, Sievänen H. Transmission of vertical whole body vibration to the human body. J Bone Miner Res. August 2008;23(8):1318-1325.|
|1999||Freitas RA Jr. Nanomedicine, Volume 1: Basic Capabilities. Georgetown, TX: Landes Bioscience; 1999.|
|2000||Matsumoto Y, Griffin MJ. Comparison of biodynamic responses in standing and seated human bodies. J Sound Vibrat. December 7, 2000;238(4):691-704.|
|2002||Salathe EP, Arangio GA. A biomechanical model of the foot: the role of muscles, tendons, and ligaments. J Biomech Eng. 2002;124(3):281-287.|
|1995||Kim W, Voloshin AS. Role of plantar fascia in the load bearing capacity of the human foot. J Biomech. September 1995;28(9):1025-1033.|
|2021||Goggins KA, Chadefaux D, Tarabini M, Arsenault M, Lievers WB, Eger T. Four degree-of-freedom lumped parameter model of the foot-ankle system exposed to vertical vibration from 10 to 60 Hz with varying centre of pressure conditions. Ergonomics. 2021;64(8):1002-1017.|
|2020||Chadefaux D, Goggins K, Cazzaniga C, Marzaroli P, Marelli S, Katz R, Eger T, Tarabini M. Development of a two-dimensional dynamic model of the foot-ankle system exposed to vibration. J Biomech. January 23, 2020;99:109547.|
|2019||Goggins KA. Measuring and Modelling Human Response to Foot-Transmitted Vibration Exposure [PhD thesis]. Sudbury, ON: Laurentian University; 2019.|