Objective: To compare the injury risk between rear-facing (RFCS) and forward-facing (FFCS) car seats for children less than 2 years of age in the USA.
Methods: Data were extracted from a US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration vehicle crash database for the years 1988–2003. Children 0–23 months of age restrained in an RFCS or FFCS when riding in passenger cars, sport utility vehicles, or light trucks were included in the study. Logistic regression models and restraint effectiveness calculations were used to compare the risk of injury between children restrained in RFCSs and FFCSs.
Results: Children in FFCSs were significantly more likely to be seriously injured than children restrained in RFCSs in all crash types (OR = 1.76, 95% CI 1.40 to 2.20). When considering frontal crashes alone, children in FFCSs were more likely to be seriously injured (OR = 1.23), although this finding was not statistically significant (95% CI 0.95 to 1.59). In side crashes, however, children in FFCSs were much more likely to be injured (OR = 5.53, 95% CI 3.74 to 8.18). When 1 year olds were analyzed separately, these children were also more likely to be seriously injured when restrained in FFCSs (OR = 5.32, 95% CI 3.43 to 8.24). Effectiveness estimates for RFCSs (93%) were found to be 15% higher than those for FFCSs (78%).
Conclusions: RFCSs are more effective than FFCSs in protecting restrained children aged 0–23 months. The same findings apply when 1 year olds are analyzed separately. Use of an RFCS, in accordance with restraint recommendations for child size and weight, is an excellent choice for optimum protection up to a child’s second birthday.
|1997||Isaksson-Hellman I, Jakobsson L, Gustafsson C, Norin H. Trends and effects of child restraint systems based on Volvo's Swedish accident database. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Child Occupant Protection Symposium. November 12, 1997; Orlando, FL.43-54. SAE 973299.|
|1969||Burdi AR, Huelke DF, Snyder RG, Lowrey GH. Infants and children in the adult world of automobile safety design: pediatric and anatomical considerations for design of child restraints. J Biomech. July 1969;2(3):267-280.|
|1991||Evans L. Traffic Safety and the Driver. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold; 1991.|
|2005||Arbogast KB, Ghati Y, Menon RA, Tylko S, Tamborra N, Morgan RM. Field investigation of child restraints in side impact crashes. Traffic Inj Prev. December 2005;6(4):351-360.|
|2000||Weber K. Crash protection for child passengers: a review of best practice. UMTRI Res Rev. July–September 2000;31(3):1-27.|
|1974||Baker SP, O'Neill B, Haddon W Jr, Long WB. The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. J Trauma. March 1974;14(3):187-196.|
|2005||Jakobsson L, Isaksson-Hellman I, Lundell B. Safety for the growing child: experiences from Swedish accident data. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV). June 6-9, 2005; Washington, DC.|
|2015||Klinich KD, Manary MA. Best practice recommendations for protecting child occupants. In: Yoganandan N, Nahum AM, Melvin JW, eds. Accidental Injury: Biomechanics and Prevention. 3rd ed. New York: Springer; 2015:697-719.|
|2010||Andersson M, Bohman K, Osvalder A-L. Effect of booster seat design on children’s choice of seating positions during naturalistic riding. In: 54th Annual Proceedings, Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine (AAAM). October 17-20, 2010; Las Vegas, NV.117-126.|
|2011||O'Neil J, Bull MJ, Talty J, Slaven JE. Important child occupant saftety trends, Indiana between 2005 and 2010. In: 55th Annual Proceedings, Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine (AAAM). October 3-5, 2011; Paris, France.27-32.|
|2011||Jakobsson L, Bohman K, Andersson M, Stockman I, Boström O, Svensson M, Svanberg H, Wimmerstedt M, Arbogast KB. Rear seat safety in frontal to side impacts: focusing on occupants from 3yrs to small adults. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV). June 13-16, 2011; Washington, DC.|
|2011||Johannsen H, Bendjellal F, Renaudin F, Claeson P. Update on lateral impact test procedure for child restraint systems. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV). June 13-16, 2011; Washington, DC.|
|2013||Whitman GR, Hart AV III, Sicher L, Benda B, D’Aulerio LA. Rear-facing child safety seat performance in frontal NCAP level crashes. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV). May 27-30, 2013; Seoul, South Korea.|
|2017||Jakobsson L, Bohman K, Stockman I, Svensson M, Wimmerstedt M, Arbogast KB. Rear seat safety for children aged 4-12: identifying the real-world needs towards development of countermeasures. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV). June 5-8, 2017; Detroit, MI.|
|2019||Tushak S, Maheshwari J, Belwadi A. Responses of the scaled infant human body model in simulated frontal motor vehicle crashes. In: Proceedings of the 26th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV). June 10-13, 2019; Eindhoven, Netherlands.|
|2013||Carlsson A, Strandroth J, Bohman K, Stockman I, Svensson MY, Wenäll J, Gummesson M, Turbell T, Jakobsson L. Review of child car occupant fatalities in Sweden during six decades. In: Proceedings of the 2013 International IRCOBI Conference on the Biomechanics of Injury. September 11-13, 2013; Gothenburg, Sweden.868-881.|
|2016||Rola E. Parametric study of 3‐year‐olds in a child restraint system with harness pretensioner and load limiter. In: Proceedings of the 2016 International IRCOBI Conference on the Biomechanics of Injury. September 14-16, 2016; Malaga, Spain.352-353.|