Background: Most anterior cruciate ligament research is limited to variables at the knee joint and is performed in the laboratory setting, often with subjects postinjury. There is a paucity of information on the position of the hip and ankle during noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injury.
Hypothesis: When landing after maneuvers, athletes with anterior cruciate ligament injury (subjects) show a more flatfooted profile and more hip flexion than uninjured athletes (controls).
Study: Design Case control study; Level of evidence, 3.
Methods: Data from 29 videos of subjects were compared with data from 27 videos of controls performing similar maneuvers. Joint angles were analyzed in 5 sequential frames in sagittal or coronal planes, starting with initial ground-foot contact. Hip, knee, and ankle joint angles were measured in each sequence in the sagittal plane and hip and knee angles in the coronal plane with computer software. The portion of the foot first touching the ground and the number of sequences required for complete foot-ground contact were assessed. Significance was set at P< .05.
Results: In sagittal views, controls first contacted the ground with the forefoot; subjects had first ground contact with the hind-foot or entirely flatfooted, attained the flatfoot position significantly sooner, had significantly less plantar-flexed ankle angles at initial contact, and had a significantly larger mean hip flexion angle at the first 3 frames. In coronal views, no significant differences in knee abduction (initial contact) or hip abduction angle were found between groups; knee abduction was relatively unchanged in controls but progressed in subjects.
Conclusion: Initial ground contact flatfooted or with the hindfoot, knee abduction and increased hip flexion may be risk factors for anterior cruciate ligament injury.
|1999||Hewett TE, Lindenfeld TN, Riccobene JV, Noyes FR. The effect of neuromuscular training on the incidence of knee injury in female athletes: a prospective study. Am J Sports Med. November–December 1999;27(6):699-706.|
|1982||Zelisko JA, Noble HB, Porter M. A comparison of men's and women's professional basketball injuries. Am J Sports Med. September–October 1982;10(5):297-299.|
|2004||Olsen O-E, Myklebust G, Engebretsen L, Bahr R. Injury mechanisms for anterior cruciate ligament injuries in team handball: a systematic video analysis. Am J Sports Med. June 2004;32(4):1002-1012.|
|1995||Markolf KL, Burchfield DM, Shapiro MM, Shepard MF, Finerman GAM, Slauterbeck JL. Combined knee loading states that generate high anterior cruciate ligament forces. J Orthop Res. November 1995;13(6):930-935.|
|2005||Hewett TE, Myer GD, Ford KR, Heidt RS Jr, Colosimo AJ, McLean SG, van den Bogert AJ, Paterno MV, Succop P. Biomechanical measures of neuromuscular control and valgus loading of the knee predict anterior cruciate ligament injury risk in female athletes: a prospective study. Am J Sports Med. April 2005;33(4):492-501.|
|2007||Krosshaug T, Nakamae A, Boden BP, Engebretsen L, Smith G, Slauterbeck JR, Hewett TE, Bahr R. Mechanisms of anterior cruciate ligament injury in basketball: video analysis of 39 cases. Am J Sports Med. March 2007;35(3):359-367.|
|2006||Hewett TE, Myer GD, Ford KR. Anterior cruciate ligament injuries in female athletes, I: mechanisms and risk factors. Am J Sports Med. February 2006;34(2):299-311.|
|2005||Krosshaug T, Bahr R. A model-based image-matching technique for three-dimensional reconstruction of human motion from uncalibrated video sequences. J Biomech. April 2005;38(4):919-929.|
|2000||Boden BP, Dean GS, Feagin JA Jr, Garrett WE Jr. Mechanisms of anterior cruciate ligament injury. Orthopedics. June 2000;23(6):573-578.|
|2002||Torg JS, Guille JT, Jaffe S. Injuries to the cervical spine in American football players. J Bone Joint Surg. January 2002;84A(1):112-122.|
|2022||Boden BP, Sheehan FT. Mechanism of non-contact ACL injury: OREF Clinical Research Award 2021. J Orthop Res. March 2022;40(3):531-540.|
|2019||Englander ZA. 3D Dynamic in Vivo Imaging of Joint Motion: Application to Measurement of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Function [PhD thesis]. Duke University; 2019.|
|2021||Kim-Wang SY. In Vivo Knee Kinematics and Cartilage Recovery of Non-Contact Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries [PhD thesis]. Duke University; 2021.|
|2022||Mühlbauer JA. Entwicklung regionaler Validierungsexperimente mit Freiwilligen für aktive Finite-Elemente Menschmodelle [PhD thesis]. Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich; 2022.|
|2016||Schussler E. Assessment, Feedback and Head Accelerations in Youth American Football [PhD thesis]. The Ohio State University; 2016.|
|2013||Satkunananthan PB. In Vivo Fluorescence Reflectance Imaging to Quantify Sex-Based Differences in Protease, MMP, and Cathepsin K Activity in a Mouse Model of Post-Traumatic Osteoarthritis [Master's thesis]. Davis, University of California; 2013.|
|2021||Kresie SW-J. Development and Evaluation of an IMU-Based Wearable Device for ACL Injury Research [Master's thesis]. Davis, University of California; 2021.|
|2017||Tomescu SS. Knee Tissue Strains and Effectiveness of a Novel Functional ACL Knee Brace During Dynamic in-Vitro Loading [Master's thesis]. University of Toronto; 2017.|
|2014||Bakker R. The Effect of Sagittal Plane Mechanics on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Strain During Jump Landing [Master's thesis]. University of Waterloo; 2014.|