Sensitivity of rear-seated Hybrid III 5th and THOR 5th to load limiting and crash pulse

Affiliations

²Autoliv North Germany

Links

Cited Works (5)

Year	Entry
2021	Carroll J, Kruse D, Mishra E, Mroz K, Lubbe N. Comparison of Hybrid III and THOR 5th percentile female dummies in frontal crash tests. In: Proceedings of the 2021 International IRCOBI Conference on the Biomechanics of Injury. September 8-10, 2021; Online.192-210.
2022	Tang K, Tylko S, Bussières A. Comparison of the THOR 5th to the Hybrid III 5th in full scale frontal crash tests. In: Proceedings of the 2022 International IRCOBI Conference on the Biomechanics of Injury. September 14-16, 2022; Porto, Portugal.439-451.
2003	Kent R, Patrie J, Benson N. The Hybrid III dummy as a discriminator of injurious and non-injurious restraint loading. In: 47th Annual Proceedings, Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine (AAAM). September 22-24, 2003; Lisbon, Portugal.51-75.
2017	Parent D, Craig M, Moorhouse K. Biofidelity evaluation of the THOR and Hybrid III 50th percentile male frontal impact anthropomorphic test devices. Stapp Car Crash J. November 2017;61:227-276. SAE 2017-22-0009.
2014	Eggers A, Eickhoff B, Dobberstein J, Zellmer H, Adolph T. Effects of variations in belt geometry, double pretensioning and adaptive load limiting on advanced chest measurements of THOR and Hybrid III. In: Proceedings of the 2014 International IRCOBI Conference on the Biomechanics of Injury. September 10-12, 2014; Berlin, Germany.347-358.