Effects of Exoskeleton Walking Therapy in the Distal Femur and Proximal Tibia in Individuals With Chronic Spinal Cord Injury

Links

URL: https://digital.wpi.edu/concern/etds/th83m225g

Abstract

Background: More than 294,000 people in the United States are living with spinal cord injuries, and over 17,000 new injuries occur every year. Individuals with SCI experience a sudden decrease in mechanical loading in their lower limbs, leading to severe bone loss known as SCI-induced osteoporosis. One proposed method to treat SCI-induced bone loss is to use exoskeleton walking therapy to load the lower limbs, but it is currently unknown whether or not the loading experienced is sufficient for any therapeutic benefits. An ongoing clinical trial (NCT 02533713) associated with this thesis allows 30 individuals with chronic SCI to complete exoskeleton walking therapy for six months. We hypothesized that exoskeleton walking therapy would be sufficient to provide therapeutic benefit, resulting in a significant increase in the bone mineral content (BMC; g) in the distal femur and proximal tibia. We also proposed to assess the kinetics and kinematics associated with walking therapy for each participant. Finally, we hypothesized that there would be a positive relationship between the change in BMC and a participant-specific measure of “bone loading dose”. Thus, our overall purpose was to determine the degree to which exoskeleton walking therapy influences BMC in a dose-dependent manner.

Methods: The present analysis includes data from 13 participants in the clinical trial. Computed tomography (CT) scans including at least 15 cm of the distal femur and proximal tibia were taken before and after six months of exoskeleton walking therapy. The scans were analyzed quantitatively (quantitative computed tomography; QCT) to calculate BMC and participant-specific measures of bone strength. The bone strength measures were used to create candidate loading dose calculations for each participant. The clinical trial intervention included 6 months of exoskeleton walking therapy performed 3 hours a week, using either the EKSO or Indego exoskeleton. Video data and pressure sensing insole data was captured during the final walking therapy sessions. The data were used to calculate the kinetics and kinematics for each individual while walking in the exoskeleton. The exoskeleton recorded the number of steps each user took and the pressure sensing insoles provided the magnitude and location of the center of pressure over time, which were also used to calculate candidate measures of loading dose. We used paired t-tests to compare preversus post-intervention values of BMC. We also used independent t-tests to compare the kinetics and kinematics of walking between the two exoskeletons. Finally, Pearson’s correlations were calculated to assess the relationship between the changes in BMC and the various loading dose calculations.

Results: There was a significant 2.40 ± 4.83% increase in femur BMC following exoskeleton walking therapy (p = 0.038). There was also a significant 8.34 ± 11.60 % and 4.23 ± 9.80 % increase in BMC of the epiphyseal region of the femur and tibia respectively (p≤0.023). The kinematics and temporal parameters varied between the two exoskeletons, with the Indego having a higher range of motion at the knee and ankle, and a faster stride time and walking speed than the EKSO. Loading dose was more closely associated with change in femur BMC versus tibia BMC (tibia r = -0.048 to -0.143, versus femur r = 0.265 to 0.457). Change in femur BMC was most positively correlated with loading dose calculated using the femoral epiphyseal bending strength index (r=0.457, p=0.024).

Conclusion: BMC increased in regions of the distal femur and proximal tibia following exoskeleton walking therapy. The kinematics and kinetics between the Indego and EKSO exoskeletons varied, but not enough to have a significant impact on the net joint forces at the ankles and knees of the users. Moderate positive correlations between participant specific loading dose calculations using femur strength metrics suggest that bone changes in a dose-dependent manner as a result of exoskeleton walking therapy. Assessing changes in bone mass compared to the amount of loading during walking therapy can provide important information to identify therapeutic targets and predict response due to exoskeleton walking therapy.

Cited Works (17)

Year	Entry
2012	Tu X, Rhee Y, Condon KW, Bivi N, Allen MR, Dwyer D, Stolina M, Turner CH, Robling AG, Plotkin LI, Bellido T. Sost downregulation and local Wnt signaling are required for the osteogenic response to mechanical loading. Bone. January 2012;50(1):209-217.
1997	Lang TF, Keyak JH, Heitz MW, Augat P, Liu Y, Mathur A, Genant HK. Volumetric quantitative computed tomography of the proximal femur: precision and relation to bone strength. Bone. July 1997;21(1):101-108.
1960	Frost HM. In vivo osteocyte death. J Bone Joint Surg. January 1960;42A(1):138-143.
2009	Winter DA. Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement. 4th ed. Hoboken, NJ: Inc, John Wiley & Sons; 2009.
2008	Weeks BK, Beck BR. The BPAQ: a bone-specific physical activity assessment instrument. Osteoporos Int. November 2008;19(11):1567-1577.
1998	Turner CH. Three rules for bone adaptation to mechanical stimuli. Bone. November 1998;23(5):399-407.
2020	Troy KL, Mancuso ME, Johnson JE, Wu Z, Schnitzer TJ, Butler TA. Bone adaptation in adult women is related to loading dose: a 12‐month randomized controlled trial. J Bone Miner Res. July 2020;35(7):1300-1312.
2011	Nakashima T, Hayashi M, Fukunaga T, Kurata K, Oh-hora M, Feng JQ, Bonewald LF, Kodama T, Wutz A, Wagner EF, Penninger JM, Takayanagi H. Evidence for osteocyte regulation of bone homeostasis through RANKL expression. Nat Med. October 2011;17(10):1231-1234.
2020	Robling AG, Bonewald LF. The osteocyte: new insights. Annu Rev Physiol. 2020;82:485-506.
2006	Lang TF, Leblanc AD, Evans HJ, Lu Y. Adaptation of the proximal femur to skeletal reloading after long-duration spaceflight. J Bone Miner Res. August 2006;21(8):1224-1230.
2004	Lang T, LeBlanc A, Evans H, Lu Y, Genant H, Yu A. Cortical and trabecular bone mineral loss from the spine and hip in long‐duration spaceflight. J Bone Miner Res. June 2004;19(6):1006-1012.
2007	Bonewald LF. Osteocytes as dynamic multifunctional cells. Annals NY Acad Sci. 2007;1116(1):281-290.
1995	Mikić B, Carter DR. Bone strain gage data and theoretical models of functional adaptation. J Biomech. April 1995;28(4):465-469.
2006	Franz-Odendaal TA, Hall BK, Witten PE. Buried alive: how osteoblasts become osteocytes. Dev Dyn. January 2006;235(1):176-190.
2003	Turner CH, Robling AG. Designing exercise regimens to increase bone strength. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. January 2003;31(1):45-50.
2008	Robling AG, Niziolek PJ, Baldridge LA, Condon KW, Allen MR, Alam I, Mantila SM, Gluhak-Heinrich J, Bellido TM, Harris SE, Turner CH. Mechanical stimulation of bone in vivo reduces osteocyte expression of Sost/sclerostin. J Biol Chem. February 29, 2008;283(9):5866-5875.
2007	Malone AMD, Anderson CT, Tummala P, Kwon RY, Johnston TR, Stearns T, Jacobs CR. Primary cilia mediate mechanosensing in bone cells by a calcium-independent mechanism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. August 14, 2007;104(33):13325-13330.