Impact of micro-computed tomography reconstruction protocols on bone microarchitecture analysis

Nascimento, Eduarda Helena Leandro; Gâeta-Araujo, Hugo; Brasil, Danieli M.; Madlum, Daniela Verardi; Freitas, Deborah Q.; Haiter-Neto, Frascisco; Oliveira-Santos, Christiano

Affiliations

¹Department of Oral Diagnosis, Division of Oral Radiology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.

²Department of Stomatology, Public Health, Forensic Dentistry, Division of Oral Radiology, School of Dentistry of Ribeirao Preto, University of Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the influence of reconstruction protocols of micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) images on analyses of bone microarchitecture.

Study Design: Micro-CT images of the maxillae of 5 Wistar rats were reconstructed with different protocols by varying the levels of the following tools: smoothing filter (SF; 2–6); ring artifact correction (RAC; 5–15); and beam hardening correction (BHC; 15%–60%). A control protocol (P0; without any correction tool) and a standard protocol (SP; according to the manufacturer's recommendation: SF = 2; RAC = 5; BHC = 45%) were also obtained. For each protocol, 8 bone microarchitecture parameters were calculated (bone volume/total volume [BV/TV], bone surface/total volume [BS/TV], trabecular number [Tb.N], trabecular thickness [Tb.Th], trabecular separation [Tb.Sp], degree of anisotropy [DA], connectivity density [Conn.D], and total porosity [Po-tot]) by using CTAn software. Test protocols were compared with the SP by using 1-way analysis of variance and the Dunnet post hoc test (α = 0.05).

Results: An inverse relationship was observed between BHC tool levels and all microarchitecture parameters except BV/TV and Tb.Th. The combination of BHC and SF significantly influenced all microarchitecture parameters except for DA, for which all protocols were similar to the SP (P > .05).

Conclusions: Calculation of bone microarchitecture parameters is influenced by the applied levels of artifact correction tools, mainly BHC and SF. It is necessary to standardize such tool levels for correct data interpretation.

Links

DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2019.05.001

PubMed: 31196704

WoS: 000487758200011

History

Received: 2019-01-23

Revised: 2019-05-03

Accepted: 2019-05-13

Cited Works (6)

Year	Entry
2010	Bouxsein ML, Boyd SK, Christiansen BA, Guldberg RE, Jepsen KJ, Müller R. Guidelines for assessment of bone microstructure in rodents using micro-computed tomography. J Bone Miner Res. July 2010;25(7):1468-1486.
2009	Meganck JA, Kozloff KM, Thornton MM, Broski SM, Goldstein SA. Beam hardening artifacts in micro-computed tomography scanning can be reduced by X-ray beam filtration and the resulting images can be used to accurately measure BMD. Bone. December 2009;45(6):1104-1116.
2004	Mulder L, Koolstra JH, Van Eijden TMGJ. Accuracy of microCT in the quantitative determination of the degree and distribution of mineralization in developing bone. Acta Radiol. November 2004;45(7):769-777.
1996	Rüegsegger P, Koller B, Müller R. A microtomographic system for the nondestructive evaluation of bone architecture. Calcif Tiss Int. 1996;58(1):24-29.
2014	Peyrin F, Dong P, Pacureanu A, Langer M. Micro- and nano-CT for the study of bone ultrastructure. Curr Osteoporos Rep. December 2014;12(4):465-474.
1997	Odgaard A. Three-dimensional methods for quantification of cancellous bone architecture. Bone. 1997;20(4):315-328.