This study investigated the biofidelity of anthropomorphic test device (ATD) abdomens subjected to a belt loading test condition. A total of six ATD/abdomen insert combinations were subjected to belt loading using a seatbelt pull mechanism, with the ATDs seated upright in a free‐back configuration. Three 50th percentile male ATDs were tested, including THOR‐K, Hybrid III 50th percentile male with reusable rate‐sensitive abdomen (HIII‐50M RRSA), and Hybrid III 50th percentile male with standard abdominal insert (HIII‐50M). Additionally, three 10‐year‐old (10yo) size child ATDs including Large Omni‐directional Child (LODC), Q10, and HIII 10yo were tested and evaluated. Force‐penetration results of the 50th percentile male ATDs were compared directly to a belt loading corridor derived from post‐mortem human subject (PMHS) testing in this test configuration, while 10yo ATD responses were compared to a scaled version of the corridor. Biofidelity of the ATD abdomen responses under free‐back seatbelt loading condition were quantified using the NHTSA Biofidelity Ranking System (BioRank). Among the adult ATDs, HIII‐50M, HIII‐50M RRSA and THOR‐K scored 1.99, 1.71 and 1.33 respectively, indicating that the THOR‐K has a response closest to PMHS. All three child ATDs displayed responses that were outside of the scaled PMHS corridor. The child ATDs showed surprisingly similar responses even though their abdominal area structures are quite different.
Keywords:
abdomen, biofidelity, LODC, seatbelt, THOR