The Brain Injury Criteria (BrIC) was recently developed by using two human head models (SIMon and GHBMC) and ATD impact and crash test data. This study used a system simulation approach to further investigate correlations between BrIC from the THOR sled tests in the NHTSA Advanced Adaptive Restraint Program (AARP) and the human occupant traumatic brain injury (TBI) AIS 4+ risks estimated with a full body human model.
Eleven sled tests for the 50thpercentile male THOR Mod Kit dummy performed in AARP were selected as the basis for this analysis. The measured THOR BrIC values from these tests ranged from 0.49 to 1.89. For each of the THOR sled tests, a FE system model was built and the correlation was confirmed with the physical test data. The full body human model, a combination of the GHBMC head model and the in-house Takata human body model (TKHM), has been validated at component and full body levels. The THOR dummy model was then replaced with the full body human model in the system and the sled test simulations for the human under the same test conditions were conducted. The maximum principal strain (MPS) and the cumulative strain damage measure (CSDM) from the human head model were calculated from deformation of the brain tissue elements. The risks of AIS 4+ TBI injuries per the CSDM and MPS measures were compared with those estimated with BrIC from the THOR sled tests using paired student t-tests.
Overall, good agreement of the head, chest and pelvis translational accelerations and the head rotational velocities between the THOR dummy and the human body model were found for the full frontal sled cases. Differences between the two were observed for the head rotational velocities under the oblique sled test conditions. The results of additional simulations where an impactor struck laterally the face-jaw of the THOR, TKHM and GHBMC indicated that the THOR head-neck twisted more and faster than the human models, which could be a major cause of the inconsistency in the oblique cases.
Linear correlations between the THOR BrIC and the AIS 4+ TBI risk estimations from CSDM and MPS outputs of the human model were observed (with R² score of 0.81 for CSDM and R²=0.85 for MPS). The TBI risks estimated from the THOR sled tests and the human model were similar in the full frontal, while th e BrIC from the THOR sled tests overestimated the TBI risks.