A rational analysis of the two apparently conflicting views of neck injury causation for contained and belted occupants in rollover crashes that have been presented in research literature to date, i.e. torso augmentation (diving) vs. roof intrusion, is presented. The validity of each of the views and associated injury causation mechanisms and underlying concepts are investigated using basic Newtonian laws of physics.
Through the analysis of General Motors Malibu II rollover test series, the authors show how roof crush at high intrusion velocities results in high neck loading. Equations are developed that demonstrate how roof intrusion is integrally linked to neck loading and hence is the main causal factor of serious neck injuries in rollover crashes. The paper also shows how roof intrusion compounds torso augmentation resulting from rollover kinematic motion.
Discussions are also presented regarding the “lift shaft” analogy proposed by Moffatt and used to explain how serious head and neck injuries occur in rollover crashes. The authors show that analogy is inappropriate by at least an order of magnitude in terms of the crash severity it suggests.