A survey of motor vehicle child restraint use found around 28% of children under the age of six using weight-inappropriate restraints. Many parents did not know when a child was likely to outgrow a booster seat nor the weight of their child, but they did know the child’s age. Anthropometric data show that, if advice on restraint transition, given solely in terms of age (6 months, 4 years, 8 years) were followed in Australia, incorrect restraint selection would occur in 5% of children under the age of six. Further analysis suggests how rewriting the Standard could reduce this number.
We present an argument for placing age-based transitions at the heart of the strategy to improve child restraint compliance. This may be superior to one based on the child’s weight or other anthropometric measurement. Our argument may be summarized as follows:
|2007||Anderson RWG, Hutchinson TP. The feasibility of age-based criteria for child restraint selection. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV). June 18-21, 2007; Lyon, France.|
|1997||Decina LE, Knoebel KY. Child safety seat misuse patterns in four states. Accid Anal Prev. 1997;29(1):125-132.|
|1994||Klinich KD, Pritz HB, Beebe MS, Welty KE. Survey of older children in automotive restraints. In: Proceedings of the 38th Stapp Car Crash Conference. October 31–November 2, 1994; Fort Lauderdale, FL. Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers:245-264. SAE 942222.|