The mechanical microenvironment within a tissue drives fundamental cell behaviours including cell survival, proliferation, and migration, that ultimately direct healthy tissue homeostasis or pathologic progression. Cells sense a variety of biophysical cues, such as externally applied strain, extracellular stiffness, and surface geometry; all of which regulate more complex processes such as cellular contraction, a tissue relevant phenomenon important in both development and disease. Local cell contraction provides a set of cell-scale mechanical cues, including tissue strain and stiffness; but how these local mechanical microenvironments drive global tissue contraction is undefined. In this work, I (1) develop and characterize a stiffness-tunable microtissue bioprinting culture platform for increased-throughput study of mechanobiological contraction, (2) develop a technique to modify microtissue geometry, to study how tissue free boundary area affects global tissue contraction, and (3) investigate how initial tissue stiffness impacts the changing local strain, local stiffness, and local forces within contracting microtissues. Stiffness impacted cell morphology and high stiffness slowed global tissue contraction rates. High stiffness was not able to stimulate contraction as well as soluble molecule stimulants, demonstrating that this mechanical signal may not be a driving cue of 3D tissue contraction. Tissue geometry affected contraction, where high tissue free boundary area increased global strain rates. This suggests that cell phenotypes at the tissue perimeter, including the organized F-actin superstructure sheet encasing the microtissue, are crucial elements of tissue contraction. Initial tissue stiffness surprisingly did not impact local stiffness during contraction, suggesting that matrix properties are insignificant contributors to local stiffness following cell seeding. Instead, live, contractile cells appeared to dominate local tissue stiffness. Increasing baseline stiffness decreased local strain and local force generation within contracting microtissues. Moreover, local, cell-induced forces did not depend on real-time local stiffness. Instead, forces arising within tissues correlated well with local tissue strain, independent of initial stiffness, suggesting that tissue strain rather than tissue stiffness may be the dominant driver of 3D contraction. Finally, this work is discussed within the context of focal adhesion formation and cell spreading. The work conducted here is supported by recent studies demonstrating that microenvironment stiffness regulates ligand recruitment, driving focal adhesion formation and downstream contractile cell behaviours such as cell spread and F-actin structure formation. This suggests that local strain is necessary for focal adhesion formation within a 3D fibrous matrix, and is therefore a crucial mechanical cue that arises during tissue contraction. This work hence provides a robust platform for mechanical analysis of tissue contraction, and highlights critical signalling cues that drive niche, local microenvironments, thereby impacting global tissue contraction