Patella height influences patellofemoral contact and kinematics following cruciate-retaining total knee replacement

Tischer, Thomas; Geier, Andreas; Lutter, Christoph; Enz, Andreas; Bader, Rainer; Kebbach, Maeruan

Affiliations

¹Department of Orthopaedics, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany

Abstract and keywords

The role of patella height is discussed controversially in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Therefore, this computational study aims to systematically analyze the biomechanical effect of different patella heights on patellofemoral (PF) forces and kinematics after cruciate-retaining (CR) TKA. We implemented a CR bicondylar TKA with a dome patellar button in a validated dynamic musculoskeletal multibody model of a male human knee joint. Retropatellar dynamics (contact force [N], shear force [N], patellar shift [mm], tilt [°], and rotation [°]) were evaluated during dual-limb squat motion (flexion from 0° to 90°) with simulated active muscle forces and the effects of different patella heights (Blackburne-Peel [BP] ratio of 0.39, 0.49, 0.65, 0.85, 1.01, and 1.1 were systematically examined). As active knee flexion increased, PF contact force also increased. Patella alta (BP = 1.1) resulted in higher PF contact forces compared to normal patella height (BP = 0.65) by up to 16%. Contrarily, patella baja was associated with decreased PF forces by 7%. Compared to patella baja (BP = 0.39), patella alta (BP = 1.1) considerably increased the contact force by up to 25%. Different patellar heights mainly affected PF shear forces during early knee flexion. Concerning PF kinematics, patella alta (BP = 1.1) yielded a greater lateral tilt of more than 4° and higher patellar rotation by up to 3° during deep knee flexion, compared to normal patella height (BP = 0.65). Our computational study indicates that patella alta is associated with the highest PF contact and shear force after the implantation of a CR bicondylar TKA. This should be considered in PF disorders following TKA.

Keywords: musculoskeletal multibody simulation; patella height; patellofemoral joint dynamics; total knee arthroplasty

Links

DOI: 10.1002/jor.25425

PubMed: 35949157

WoS: 000846453000001

History

Received: 2021-09-17

Revised: 2022-06-06

Accepted: 2022-08-09

Cited Works (11)

Year	Entry
2001	Anderson FC, Pandy MG. Static and dynamic optimization solutions for gait are practically equivalent. J Biomech. February 2001;34(2):153-161.
2003	Thelen DG, Anderson FC, Delp SL. Generating dynamic simulations of movement using computed muscle control. J Biomech. March 2003;36(3):321-328.
2002	Wu G, Siegler S, Allard P, Kirtley C, Leardini A, Rosenbaum D, Whittle M, D'Lima DD, Cristofolini L, Witte H, Schmid O, Stokes I. ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate system of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion, I: ankle, hip, and spine. J Biomech. 2002;35(4):543-548.
1996	Blankevoort L, Huiskes R. Validation of a three-dimensional model of the knee. J Biomech. July 1996;29(7):955-961.
1991	Blankevoort L, Kuiper JH, Huiskes R, Grootenboer HJ. Articular contact in a three-dimensional model of the knee. J Biomech. 1991;24(11):1019-1031.
1981	Crowninshield RD, Brand RA. A physiologically based criterion of muscle force prediction in locomotion. J Biomech. 1981;14(11):793-801.
1983	Grood ES, Suntay WJ. A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee. J Biomech Eng. May 1983;105(2):136-144.
2012	Fregly BJ, Besier TF, Lloyd DG, Delp SL, Banks SA, Pandy MG, D'Lima DD. Grand challenge competition to predict in vivo knee loads. J Orthop Res. April 2012;30(4):503-513.
2015	Marra MA, Vanheule V, Fluit R, Koopman BHFJM, Rasmussen J, Verdonschot N, Andersen MS. A subject-specific musculoskeletal modeling framework to predict in vivo mechanics of total knee arthroplasty. J Biomech Eng. February 2015;137(2):020904.
1980	Wismans J, Veldpaus F, Janssen J, Huson A, Struben P. A three-dimensional mathematical model of the knee-joint. J Biomech. 1980;13(8):677-685.
2015	Carbone V, Fluit R, Pellikaan P, van der Krogt MM, Janssen D, Damsgaard M, Vigneron L, Feilkas T, Koopman HFJM, Verdonschot N. TLEM 2.0: a comprehensive musculoskeletal geometry dataset for subject-specific modeling of lower extremity. J Biomech. March 18, 2015;48(5):734-741.