The rise of autonomous vehicles may lead to alternative seating options, including more reclined positions. Belt-positioning booster seats (BPBs) were found to prevent submarining in reclined children when exposed to frontal impacts, but it is unclear if that is the case for lateral-oblique impacts and how pre-crash motion influences the position of reclined children during lateraloblique impacts. In this study, we examined the effects of BPB type and seatback recline angle on children’s responses during a low-acceleration lateral-oblique impact. Five children (6-8 y.o.) seated in two different BPBs with three different seatback recline angles (25°, 45°, and 60°) were exposed to a sled-simulated low-acceleration lateral-oblique pulse (2 g). Human kinematics were recorded with a 10-camera 3D motion-capture system. Seatbelt peak forces were collected with three seatbelt load cells. Lateral and forward peak head and trunk displacements, knee-head forward distance, and seatbelt peak loads (shoulder, left lap, and right lap) were examined. Results showed that lateral peak head and trunk displacement decreased as the seatback recline angle increased (head, 25°: 268 ± 20 mm, 45°: 248 ± 12 mm, 60°: 205 ± 9 mm, p<0.002; trunk, 25°: 154 ± 19 mm, 45°: 133 ± 16 mm, 60°: 106 ± 11 mm, p<0.001). Shoulder belt peak load also decreased as seatback recline angle increased (25°: 93 ± 6 N, 45°: 65 ± 8 N, 60°: 48 ± 13 N, p<0.001). Video analyses confirm that the lap belt did not travel up and over the pelvis. There were no statistically significant differences in forward peak head and trunk displacement, although a trend was observed in which forward peak head displacement slightly increased as recline angle increased (25°: 48 ± 19 mm, 45°: 57 ± 25 mm, 60°: 72 ± 25 mm, p>0.07). These results suggest that submarining did not occur in reclined configurations combined with the use of a low-back BPB. The severe reclined configurations with a BPB may reduce out-of-position posture in lateraloblique pre-crash maneuvers.