Variation in trabecular and cortical bone properties is often used to infer habitual behavior in the past. However, the structures of both types of bone are rarely considered together and may even contradict each other in functional interpretations. We examine trabecular and cortical bone properties in various athletes and sedentary controls to clarify the associations between combinations of cortical and trabecular bone properties and various loading modalities.
We compare trabecular and cortical bone properties using peripheral quantitative computed tomography scans of the tibia between groups of 83 male athletes (running, hockey, swimming, cricket) and sedentary controls using Bayesian multilevel models. We quantify midshaft cortical bone rigidity and area (J, CA), midshaft shape index (Imax/Imin), and mean trabecular bone mineral density (BMD) in the distal tibia.
All groups show unique combinations of biomechanical properties. Cortical bone rigidity is high in sports that involve impact loading (cricket, running, hockey) and low in nonimpact loaded swimmers and controls. Runners have more anteroposteriorly elliptical midshafts compared to other groups. Interestingly, all athletes have greater trabecular BMD compared to controls, but do not differ credibly among each other.
Results suggest that cortical midshaft hypertrophy is associated with impact loading while trabecular BMD is positively associated with both impact and nonimpact loading. Midshaft shape is associated with directionality of loading. Individuals from the different categories overlap substantially, but group means differ credibly, suggesting that nuanced group‐level inferences of habitual behavior are possible when combinations of trabecular and cortical bone are analyzed.
|2003||Turner CH, Robling AG. Designing exercise regimens to increase bone strength. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. January 2003;31(1):45-50.|
|2001||Rubin C, Turner AS, Bain S, Mallinckrodt C, McLeod K. Low mechanical signals strengthen long bones. Nature. August 9, 2001;412(6847):603-604.|
|2006||Pontzer H, Lieberman DE, Momin E, Devlin MJ, Polk JD, Hallgrímsson B, Cooper DML. Trabecular bone in the bird knee responds with high sensitivity to changes in load orientation. J Exp Biol. January 2006;209(1):57-65.|
|2003||Frost HM. Bone's mechanostat: a 2003 update. Anat Rec. 2003;275A(2):1081-1101.|
|2019||Doershuk LJ, Saers JPP, Shaw CN, Jashashvili T, Carlson KJ, Stock JT, Ryan TM. Complex variation of trabecular bone structure in the proximalhumerus and femur of five modern human populations. Am J Phys Anthropol. January 2019;168(1):104-118.|
|2010||Lynch ME, Main RP, Xu Q, Walsh DJ, Schaffler MB, Wright TM, van der Meulen MCH. Cancellous bone adaptation to tibial compression is not sex dependent in growing mice. J Appl Physiol. September 2010;109(3):685-691.|
|2002||Rubin C, Turner AS, Müller R, Mittra E, McLeod K, Lin W, Qin Y. Quantity and quality of trabecular bone in the femur are enhanced by a strongly anabolic, noninvasive mechanical intervention. J Bone Miner Res. February 2002;17(2):349-357.|
|2011||Barak MM, Lieberman DE, Hublin J-J. A Wolff in sheep's clothing: trabecular bone adaptation in response to changes in joint loading orientation. Bone. December 2011;49(6):1141-1151.|
|2004||Pearson OM, Lieberman DE. The aging of Wolff's "law": ontogeny and responses to mechanical loading in cortical bone. Yearb Phys Anthropol. 2004;47:63-99.|
|1998||Mosley JR, Lanyon LE. Strain rate as a controlling influence on adaptive modeling in response to dynamic loading of the ulna in growing male rats. Bone. October 1998;23(4):313-318.|
|2000||Huiskes R, Ruimerman R, van Lenthe GH, Janssen JD. Effects of mechanical forces on maintenance and adaptation of form in trabecular bone. Nature. June 8, 2000;405(6787):704-706.|
|2002||Rubin C, Turner AS, Mallinckrodt C, Jerome C, Mcleod K, Bain S. Mechanical strain, induced noninvasively in the high-frequency domain, is anabolic to cancellous bone, but not cortical bone. Bone. March 2002;30(3):445-452.|
|2006||Ruff C, Holt B, Trinkaus E. Who's afraid of the big bad Wolff? "Wolff's law" and bone functional adaptation. Am J Phys Anthropol. April 2006;129(4):484-498.|
|2010||Sugiyama T, Price JS, Lanyon LE. Functional adaptation to mechanical loading in both cortical and cancellous bone is controlled locally and is confined to the loaded bones. Bone. February 2010;46(2):314-321.|