Reducing whole-body vibration through field vibration tested heavy equipment seat retrofitting

Oliver, Michele; Hope, Patricia; Conrad, Leanne; Jack, Robert J.; Dickey, James P.; Eger, Tammy

Affiliations

¹School of Engineering, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada

²Center for Research in Occupational Safety and Health, Laurentian University, Sudbury, ON, Canada

³University of Western Ontario, London Ontario, Canada

Abstract and keywords

BACKGROUND: Heavy mobile equipment operation exposes operators to whole-body vibration (WBV) through the seat. The decision of which seat to retrofit a machine with is usually done statically.

OBJECTIVE: To report on the third phase of a three phase project designed to intelligently retrofit seats in heavy mobile machines with the purpose of reducing machine operator WBV exposure.

METHODS: Three slag pot haulers were retrofitted with a 6801 Isringhausen seat in which the seat pan cushion was retrofitted with SkydexTM seating material. Vibration dose values (weighted for health), vibration total values (weighted for comfort) and Seat Effective Amplitude Transmissibility were determined from field measurements.

RESULTS: WBV was reduced from the first field study to below the upper boundary of the ISO 2631-1 (1997) health guidance caution zone and comfort weighted vibration total values were reduced to the second lowest discomfort rating.

CONCLUSIONS: Steel making and other similar industries have been provided with information to more efficiently retrofit existing machines.

Keywords: Whole-body vibration, operator reported comfort, seat selection, ISO 2631-1(1997)

Links

DOI: 10.3233/OER-160239

Cited Works (12)

Year	Entry
1996	Malchaire J, Piette A, Mullier I. Vibration exposure on fork-lift trucks. Ann Occup Hyg. February 1996;40(1):79-91.
1998	Bovenzi M, Hulshof CTJ. An updated review of epidemiologic studies on the relationship between exposure to whole-body vibration and low back pain. J Sound Vibrat. August 27, 1998;215(4):595-611.
2008	Cation S, Jack R, Oliver M, Dickey JP, Lee-Shee NK. Six degree of freedom whole-body vibration during forestry skidder operations. Int J Ind Ergon. September–October 2008;38(9-10):739-757.
1978	Griffin MJ. The evaluation of vehicle vibration and seats. Appl Ergon. March 1978;9(1):15-21.
1997	Mechanical Vibration and Shock: Evaluation of Human Exposure to Whole-Body Vibration, I: General Requirements. ISO Standard ISO 2631-1. [ISO Standard thesis]. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization; 1997.
1990	Griffin MJ. Handbook of Human Vibration. London, UK: Academic Press Limited; 1990.
2002	Paddan GS, Griffin MJ. Effect of seating on exposures to whole-body vibration in vehicles. J Sound Vibrat. May 23, 2002;253(1):215-241.
2002	Donati P. Survey of technical preventative measures to reduce whole-body vibration effects when designing mobile machinery. J Sound Vibrat. May 23, 2002;253(1):169-183.
2005	Mansfield NJ. Human Response to Vibration. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2005.
2003	van Niekerk JL, Pielemeier WJ, Greenberg JA. The use of seat effective amplitude transmissibility (SEAT) values to predict dynamic seat comfort. J Sound Vibrat. March 6, 2003;260(5):867-888.
2000	Lings S, Leboeuf-Yde C. Whole-body vibration and low back pain: a systematic, critical review of the epidemiological literature 1992-1999. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. July 2000;73(5):290-297.
2005	Rehn B, Lundström R, Nilsson L, Liljelind I, Järvholm B. Variation in exposure to whole-body vibration for operators of forwarder vehicles: aspects on measurement strategies and prevention. Int J Ind Ergon. September 2005;35(9):831-842.