Comparison of different fixation methods of the suture-button implant for tibiofibular syndesmosis injuries

Teramoto, Atsushi; Suzuki, Daisuke; Kamiya, Tomoaki; Chikenji, Takako; Watanabe, Kota; Yamashita, Toshihiko

Affiliations

¹Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan

²Department of Anatomy, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan

Abstract and keywords

Background: Suture-button fixation for tibiofibular syndesmosis injuries is a relatively new surgical technique thought to provide semirigid dynamic stabilization. However, adequate information is still not available and there are controversies as to whether it provides enough fixation for syndesmosis injuries.

Hypothesis: Optimally directed suture-button fixation brings physiologic dynamic stabilization of the ankle syndesmosis.

Study Design: Controlled laboratory study.

Methods: Stabilization of the ankle syndesmosis fixed by a suture-button construct was examined using 6 normal fresh-frozen cadaver legs. After initial tests of intact and injured models, suture-button fixation and screw surgical techniques were performed sequentially for each specimen, with single suture-button fixation, double suture-button fixation, anatomic suture-button fixation, and metal screw. Anterior and medial traction forces, as well as external rotation force, were applied to the tibia; the diastasis of the syndesmosis and the rotational angle of the fibula related to the tibia were measured using a magnetic tracking system.

Results: Each traction and rotation force significantly increased the diastasis and fibular rotational angles in the created injury models. With single fixation, the diastases increased significantly compared with the intact model with an anterior traction force (P < .001), a medial traction force (P = .005), and an external rotation force (P = .015). The fibular rotational angles increased significantly with a medial traction force (P = .005) and an external rotation force (P < .001). With double fixation, the diastases increased significantly with a medial traction force (P = .004) and an external rotation force (P = .012). The fibular rotational angles increased significantly with a medial traction force (P = .035) and an external rotation force (P = .002). With anatomic fixation, there were no significant differences compared with the intact model. With the metal screw, the diastases decreased significantly with an external rotation force (P = .037).

Conclusion: Neither single nor double fixation for syndesmosis injuries provided multidirectionally stabilizing syndesmosis. Anatomic fixation directed from the posterior cortex of the fibula to the anterolateral edge of the tibia allowed dynamic stabilization of intact cadaver specimens. The metal screw provided very rigid fixation.

Clinical Relevance: Optimal direction of the suture button can provide adequate stabilization of the ankle and could benefit athletes with syndesmosis injuries.

Keywords: syndesmosis; TightRope; instability; biomechanics

Links

DOI: 10.1177/0363546511413455

PubMed: 21768530

WoS: 000296287800031

Cited Works (15)

Year	Entry
1999	Miller RS, Weinhold PS, Dahners LE. Comparison of tricortical screw fixation versus a modified suture construct for fixation of ankle syndesmosis injury: a biomechanical study. J Orthop Trauma. January 1999;13(1):39-42.
2002	Hovis WD, Kaiser BW, Watson JT, Bucholz RW. Treatment of syndesmotic disruptions of the ankle with bioabsorbable screw fixation. J Bone Joint Surg. January 2002;84A(1):26-31.
1990	Hopkinson WJ, St Pierre P, Ryan JB, Wheeler JH. Syndesmosis sprains of the ankle. Foot Ankle. June 1990;10(6):325-330.
1995	Xenos JS, Hopkinson WJ, Mulligan ME, Olson EJ, Popovic NA. The tibiofibular syndesmosis: evaluation of the ligamentous structures, methods of fixation, and radiographic assessment. J Bone Joint Surg. June 1995;77A(6):847-856.
1997	McBryde A, Chiasson B, Wilhelm A, Donovan F, Ray T, Bacilla P. Syndesmotic screw placement: a biomechanical analysis. Foot Ankle Int. May 1997;18(5):262-266.
2004	Wright RW, Barile RJ, Surprenant DA, Matava MJ. Ankle syndesmosis sprains in National Hockey League players. Am J Sports Med. December 2004;32(8):1941-1945.
1989	Needleman RL, Skrade DA, Stiehl JB. Effect of the syndesmotic screw on ankle motion. Foot Ankle. August 1989;10(1):17-24.
1991	Seitz WH Jr, Bachner EJ, Abram LJ, Postak P, Polando G, Brooks DB, Greenwald AS. Repair of the tibiofibular syndesmosis with a flexible implant. J Orthop Trauma. March 1991;5(1):78-82.
1998	Gerber JP, Williams GN, Scoville CR, Arciero RA, Taylor DC. Persistent disability associated with ankle sprains: a prospective examination of an athletic population. Foot Ankle Int. October 1998;19(10):653-660.
2003	Thornes B, Walsh A, Hislop M, Murray P, O'Brien M. Suture-endobutton fixation of ankle tibio-fibular diastasis: a cadaver study. Foot Ankle Int. February 2003;24(2):142-146.
2010	Klitzman R, Zhao H, Zhang L-Q, Strohmeyer G, Vora A. Suture-button versus screw fixation of the syndesmosis: a biomechanical analysis. Foot Ankle Int. January 2010;31(1):69-75.
2008	Teramoto A, Kura H, Uchiyama E, Suzuki D, Yamashita T. Three-dimensional analysis of ankle instability after tibiofibular syndesmosis injuries: a biomechanical experimental study. Am J Sports Med. February 2008;36(2):348-352.
2005	Thornes B, Shannon F, Guiney A-M, Hession P, Masterson E. Suture-button syndesmosis fixation: accelerated rehabilitation and improved outcomes. Clin Orthop Relat Res. February 2005;431:207-212.
1991	Boytim MJ, Fischer DA, Neumann L. Syndesmotic ankle sprains. Am J Sports Med. 1991;19(3):294-298.
1975	Cedell CA. Ankle lesions. Acta Orthop Scand. June 1975;46(3):425-445.

Cited By (2)

Year	Entry
2013	Hunt KJ. Syndesmosis injuries. Curr Rev Musculoskel Med. December 2013;6(4):304-312.
2016	Lareau CR, Hsu AR, Cohen BE. Acute syndesmotic injuries. In: Valderrabano V, Easley M, eds. Foot and Ankle Sports Orthopaedics. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2016:265-277.