Age-related bone loss is a serious health concern for Western societies. The acquisition and maintenance of the adult skeleton are influenced by several factors, including genetic, nutritional, mechanical, hormonal, and environmental factors. Exercise has been promoted as a means to increase peak bone mass and inhibit age-related bone loss. Cross-sectional studies generally confirm the positive effects of exercise on bone mass, however results from exercise intervention trials have been contradictory. While quantitative relationships between physical activity and bone mass have yet to be established, several theories have been proposed that describe mathematically the influence of mechanical loading on bone deposition and resorption. These bone remodeling theories, in conjunction with an evaluation of the mechanical loading provided to skeletal tissue by exercise, may provide im portant insights concerning the relationship between exercise and bone.
In this dissertation both experimental and analytic methods w ere used to explore the relationship between physical activity and adult bone density. New analytic methods were developed to assess bone density non-invasively and to estimate skeletal mechanical loading. A major component of this research was a randomized exercise intervention trial in young women. This study provided baseline cross-sectional data concerning the relation between bone density and physical activity, as well as longitudinal measures of bone response to exercise intervention. To examine further relations between exercise and bone, results from the intervention trial were analyzed using a computational time-dependent bone remodeling theory.
Non-invasive bone densitometry is a standard method for assessing bone mineral in the lum bar spine, proximal femur, and other skeletal regions. The most common densitometry techniques, dual-photon and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, report regional areal bone mineral densities (BMD, g/cm²). We demonstrate that, in many cases, these areal density measures can be misleading due to variations in bone thickness. We developed an analytic technique that uses traditional densitometry data to compute a new parameter. This new parameter, bone mineral apparent density (BMAD, g/cm²), accounts for bone size and is designed to be proportional to bone apparent density. These new methods were applied to lumbar spine measurements in young women and appear to offer advantages to conventional densitometry techniques.
A method for estimating the daily mechanical stimulus of the lumbar spine was developed. Self-reported activity diaries, anthropometry, and bone densitometry data are used to compute individual mechanical stimuli. Subjects' daily activities are categorized into 6 basic events: lying, sitting, standing, walking, running, or weight lifting. Load parameters for these events were taken from the literature or computed using a simple biomechanical model of the lumbar spine. This method allows for a quantitative analysis of the mechanical loading provided to the skeleton by exercise.
Healthy, premenopausal women were recruited to participate in an exercise intervention study. As a first step we conducted a cross-sectional analysis of the baseline data. We compared current physical activity, assessed by energy expenditure and lumbar spine daily stress stimulus, to baseline bone density in 51 women. Lumbar spine and femoral neck bone mineral density were m odestly correlated to body weight, body mass index (w t/h t^), and daily energy expenditure, but were independent of energy expenditure per body weight. Thus, increased body size may by the primary influence on bone mineral density. Lumbar spine daily stress stimulus was not related to any baseline bone mineral measures. We concluded that estimates of current physical activity have limited use in identifying bone density variations in normal young women. This finding suggests that a life history of genetic, metabolic, and mechanical events contribute to adult bone density.
The second component of this study was a formal, randomized exercise intervention. Thirty women who were randomly assigned to a running, weight training, or control group completed the study. After 8-months of progressive training, the bone mineral density of the lumbar spine increased (p<0.05) in the weight training (1.2±1.8%) and running (1.3±1.6%) groups, whereas no change was observed in the control group. None of the groups exhibited bone mineral changes at the proximal femur. The weight training group increased muscle strength (10-54%, p<0.01) in all muscle groups tested, whereas no changes were seen in the running or control groups. Aerobic performance improved only in the running group (16%, p<0.01). The results dem onstrate that 8 months of supervised progressive training in either running or resistance exercise modestly increases lumbar spine bone mineral density in young women.
We used a time-dependent bone remodeling algorithm to analyze the exercise intervention results. Changes in mechanical stimulus throughout the study were computed from subjects' daily activity diaries and detailed workout logs. For each subject we determined the remodeling rate law that best predicted the measured change in spine density. Changes in spine density due to exercise intervention were successfully emulated using a linear rate law. We found a broad range of rate law slopes. This range of rate law slopes suggests that each person may have her own 'rate law' or that other, non-stress related factors are confounding variables. The bone remodeling algorithm may be used to emulate the mean response of a group to exercise intervention. However, due to subject variability seen in this study, the model is not capable of predicting the response of individuals.
This dissertation adds a new perspective to the literature concerning exercise and bone density. For the first time, skeletal mechanical loading due to exercise is estimated and used to interpret results from exercise intervention trials. Further application of computational bone remodeling algorithms may provide insights into the design of exercise intervention protocols.
|1990||Beaupré GS, Orr TE, Carter DR. An approach for time‐dependent bone modeling and remodeling: theoretical development. J Orthop Res. September 1990;8(5):651-661.|
|1988||Whalen RT, Carter DR, Steele CR. Influence of physical activity on the regulation of bone density. J Biomech. 1988;21(10):825-837.|
|1984||Parfitt AM. The cellular basis of bone remodeling: the quantum concept reexamined in light of recent advances in the cell biology of bone. Calcif Tiss Int. March 1984;36(suppl 1):S37-S45.|
|1987||Frost HM. The mechanostat: a proposed pathogenic mechanism of osteoporoses and the bone mass effects of mechanical and nonmechanical agents. Bone Miner. April 1987;2(2):73-85.|
|1972||Chamay A, Tschantz P. Mechanical influences in bone remodeling: experimental research on Wolff's law. J Biomech. March 1972;5(2):173-180.|
|1981||Riggs BL, Wahner HW, Dunn WL, Mazess RB, Offord KP, Melton LJ III. Differential changes in bone mineral density of the appendicular and axial skeleton with aging: relationship to spinal osteoporosis. J Clin Invest. February 1981;67(2):328-335.|
|1969||Frost HM. Tetracycline-based histological analysis of bone remodeling. Calcif Tiss Res. 1969;3(1):211-237.|
|1986||Mosekilde L, Mosekilde L. Normal vertebral body size and compressive strength: relations to age and to vertebral and iliac trabecular bone compressive strength. Bone. 1986;7(3):207-212.|
|1992||Carter DR, Bouxsein ML, Marcus R. New approaches for interpreting projected bone densitometry data. J Bone Miner Res. February 1992;7(2):137-145.|
|1977||Carter DR, Hayes WC. The compressive behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure. J Bone Joint Surg. 1977;59A(7):954-962.|
|1987||Carter DR, Fyhrie DP, Whalen RT. Trabecular bone density and loading history: regulation of connective tissue biology by mechanical energy. J Biomech. 1987;20(8):785-794.|
|1990||Lotz JC, Hayes WC. The use of quantitative computed tomography to estimate risk of fracture of the hip from falls. J Bone Joint Surg. June 1990;72A(5):689-700.|
|1969||Clauser CE, McConville JT, Young JW. Weight, Volume, and Center of Mass of Segments of the Human Body. Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio: Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory; August 1969. Report No. AFRL-TR-69-70.|
|1990||Cummings SR, Black DM, Nevitt MC, Browner WS, Cauley JA, Genant HK, Mascioli SR, Scott JC, Seeley DG, Steiger P, Vogt TM; The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Appendicular bone density and age predict hip fracture in women. JAMA. February 2, 1990;263(5):665-668.|
|1987||Roesler H. The history of some fundamental concepts in bone biomechanics. J Biomech. 1987;20(11-12):1025-1034.|
|1989||Hui SL, Slemenda CW, Johnston CC Jr. Baseline measurement of bone mass predicts fracture in white women. Ann Intern Med. September 1, 1989;111(5):355-361.|
|1985||McBroom RJ, Hayes WC, Edwards WT, Goldberg RP, White AA III. Prediction of vertebral body compressive fracture using quantitative computed tomography. J Bone Joint Surg. 1985;67A(8):1206-1214.|
|1988||Alho A, Husby R, Høiseth A. Bone mineral content and mechanical strength: an ex vivo study on human femora at autopsy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. February 1988;227:292-297.|
|1984||Parfitt AM. Age-related structural changes in trabecular and cortical bone: cellular mechanisms and biomechanical consequences. Calcif Tiss Int. 1984;36(suppl 1):S123-S128.|
|1988||Recker RR, Kimmel DB, Parfitt MA, Davies MK, Keshawarz N, Hinders S. Static and tetracycline‐based bone histomorphometric data from 34 normal postmenopausal females. J Bone Miner Res. April 1988;3(2):133-344.|
|1990||Orr TE. The Role of Mechanical Stresses in Bone Remodeling [PhD thesis]. Stanford, CA: Stanford University; September 1990.|
|1989||Carter DR, Orr TE, Fyhrie DP. Relationships between loading history and femoral cancellous bone architecture. J Biomech. 1989;22(3):231-244.|
|1984||Rubin CT, Lanyon LE. Regulation of bone formation by applied dynamic loads. J Bone Joint Surg. March 1984;66A(3):397-402.|
|1987||Rubin CT, Lanyon LE. Osteoregulatory nature of mechanical stimuli: function as a determinant for adaptive remodeling in bone. J Orthop Res. 1987;5(2):300-310.|
|1986||Fyhrie DP, Carter DR. A unifying principle relating stress to trabecular bone morphology. J Orthop Res. 1986;4(3):304-317.|
|1984||Carter DR. Mechanical loading histories and cortical bone remodeling. Calcif Tiss Int. March 1984;36(suppl 1):S19-S24.|
|1988||Phillips S, Fox N, Jacobs J, Wright WE. The direct medical costs of osteoporosis for american women aged 45 and older, 1986. Bone. 1988;9(5):271-279.|
|1978||Melsen F, Mosekilde L. Tetracycline double-labeling of iliac trabecular bone in 41 normal adults. Calcif Tiss Res. December 1978;26(2):99-102.|
|1987||Carter DR. Mechanical loading history and skeletal biology. J Biomech. 1987;20(11-12):1095-1109.|
|1990||Beaupré GS, Orr TE, Carter DR. An approach for time‐dependent bone modeling and remodeling—application: a preliminary remodeling simulation. J Orthop Res. September 1990;8(5):662-670.|
|1987||Huiskes R, Weinans H, Grootenboer HJ, Dalstra M, Fudala B, Slooff TJ. Adaptive bone-remodeling theory applied to prosthetic-design analysis. J Biomech. 1987;20(11-12):1135-1150.|
|1984||Cowin SC. Mechanical modeling of the stress adaptation process in bone. Calcif Tiss Int. March 1984;36(suppl 1):S98-S103.|
|1989||Brinckmann P, Biggemann M, Hilweg D. Prediction of the compressive strength of human lumbar vertebrae. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1989;4(suppl 2):S1-S27.|