Cost-effectiveness of balloon kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty versus conservative medical management in the USA

Hopkins, T. J.; Eggington, S.; Quinn, M.; Nichols-Ricker, C. I.

Affiliations

¹Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Duke Health, Duke University, Durham, USA

²Medtronic Global Health Economics & Reimbursement, Tolochenaz, Switzerland

³Medtronic Pain Therapies Health Economics & Reimbursement, Fridley, USA

Abstract and keywords

Summary: The cost-effectiveness of surgical versus conservative medical management of vertebral compression fractures in the US was analyzed in the context of inpatient versus outpatient treatment. Surgical intervention (balloon kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty) was found to be cost-effective relative to conservative medical management at a US willingness-to-pay threshold.

Introduction: To date, only one published study has evaluated the cost-effectiveness (C/E) of balloon kyphoplasty (BKP) or vertebroplasty (VP) in US Medicare patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. This study further evaluates the C/E of surgical treatment vs. conservative medical management (CMM), expanding on prior modeling by accounting for quality-adjusted life-years gained.

Methods: A Markov microsimulation model of 1000 patients was constructed. Cost data were based on an analysis of Medicare claims payments, with propensity-score matching performed for BKP and VP vs. controls (CMM). Mortality inputs were based on US life tables, modified to account for age at initial fracture, presence of subsequent fracture(s), and relative risk of mortality by treatment. Separate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated for BKP and VP in inpatient and outpatient surgical treatment locations to account for individual clinical profiles presenting to each.

Results: The discounted ICER for inpatient BKP vs. CMM was $43,455 per QALY gained; for outpatient BKP vs. CMM, $10,922; for inpatient VP vs. CMM, $39,774; and for outpatient VP vs. CMM, $12,293. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis confirmed that both BKP and VP would be considered C/E vs. CMM at a US willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $50,000/QALY in 80% and 100% of 500 model simulations, respectively. The most sensitive parameters included quality of life estimates and hazard ratios for mortality.

Conclusion: While VP and BKP are more expensive treatment options than CMM in the short term, model results suggest interventional treatment is cost-effective, among patients eligible for surgery, at a US WTP threshold. This conclusion supports those from economic analyses conducted in EU-member countries.

Keywords: Balloon kyphoplasty; Cost-effectiveness; Markov model; Osteoporosis; Vertebral compression fracture; Vertebroplasty

Links

DOI: 10.1007/s00198-020-05513-x

PubMed: 32656632

WoS: 000547803900001

History

Received: 2020-03-04

Accepted: 2020-06-19

Online: 2020-07-12

Cited Works (5)

Year	Entry
2000	Klotzbuecher CM, Ross PD, Landsman PB, Abbott TA III, Berger M. Patients with prior fractures have an increased risk of future fractures: a summary of the literature and statistical synthesis. J Bone Miner Res. April 2000;15(4):721-739.
2007	Burge R, Dawson‐Hughes B, Solomon DH, Wong JB, King A, Tosteson A. Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis‐related fractures in the United States, 2005–2025. J Bone Miner Res. March 2007;22(3):465-475.
2005	Johnell O, Kanis J. Epidemiology of osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int. March 2005;16(suppl 2):S3-S7.
2009	Bliuc D, Nguyen ND, Milch VE, Nguyen TV, Eisman JA, Center JR. Mortality risk associated with low-trauma osteoporotic fracture and subsequent fracture in men and women. JAMA. February 4, 2009;301(5):513-521.
1996	Marshall D, Johnell O, Wedel H. Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures. BMJ. May 18, 1996;312(7041):1254-1259.