Objectives: Ankle fractures with a syndesmotic injury have historically been treated with syndesmotic screw fixation. We compared range of motion and functional outcomes' scores to assess patient benefit from syndesmotic screw and plate removal.
Design: Level IV-case series.
Setting: Level I-trauma center.
Patients/Participants: Twenty-five consecutive patients with unstable ankle fractures and syndesmotic injury confirmed on magnetic resonance imaging.
Intervention: Locked syndesmotic screws and plates were removed; functional outcomes and range of motion were measured before and after screw removal.
Main Outcome Measurements: Foot and Ankle Outcome Score, Olerud and Molander Ankle Score, and physical examination
Results: There was a significant improvement in range of motion, Foot and Ankle Outcome, and Olerud and Molander Ankle scores at the immediate postoperative visit. This was not significantly changed at longer follow-up. There were no adverse events or complications in these patients. No patient had radiographic loss of syndesmotic reduction after screw removal.
Conclusions: Locked screw and plate removal improved function both subjectively and objectively. Transsyndesmotic implant removal seems to assist improvements in the speed of rehabilitation.
|1989||Boden SD, Labropoulos PA, McCowin P, Lestini WF, Hurwitz SR. Mechanical considerations for the syndesmosis screw: a cadaver study. J Bone Joint Surg. December 1989;71A(10):1548-1555.|
|1993||Burns WC II, Prakash K, Adelaar R, Beaudoin A, Krause W. Tibiotalar joint dynamics: indications for the syndesmotic screw: a cadaver study. Foot Ankle. March–April 1993;14(3):153-158.|
|1994||Yamaguchi K, Martin CH, Boden SD, Labropoulos PA. Operative treatment of syndesmotic disruptions without use of a syndesmotic screw: a prospective clinical study. Foot Ankle Int. August 1994;15(8):407-414.|
|1989||Kaye RA. Stabilization of ankle syndesmosis injuries with a syndesmosis screw. Foot Ankle. 1989;9(6):290-293.|
|2006||Bragonzoni L, Russo A, Girolami M, Albisinni U, Visani A, Mazzotti N, Marcacci M. The distal tibiofibular syndesmosis during passive foot flexion: RSA-based study on intact, ligament injured and screw fixed cadaver specimens. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. July 2006;126(5):304-308.|
|1984||Leeds HC, Ehrlich MG. Instability of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis after bimalleolar and trimalleolar ankle fractures. J Bone Joint Surg. April 1984;66A(4):490-503.|
|2008||Dattani R, Patnaik S, Kantak A, Srikanth B, Selvan TP. Injuries to the tibiofibular syndesmosis. J Bone Joint Surg. April 2008;90B(4):405-410.|
|2006||Moore JA Jr, Shank JR, Morgan SJ, Smith WR. Syndesmosis fixation: a comparison of three and four cortices of screw fixation without hardware removal. Foot Ankle Int. August 2006;27(8):567-572.|
|2007||Zalavras C, Thordarson D. Ankle syndesmotic injury. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. June 2007;15(6):330-339.|
|1995||Chissell HR, Jones J. The influence of a diastasis screw on the outcome of Weber type-C ankle fractures. J Bone Joint Surg. May 1995;77B(3):435-438.|
|1994||Peter RE, Harrington RM, Henley MB, Tencer AF. Biomechanical effects of internal fixation of the distal tibiofibular syndesmotic joint: comparison of two fixation techniques. J Orthop Trauma. June 1994;8(3):215-219.|
|1985||de Souza LJ, Gustilo RB, Meyer TJ. Results of operative treatment of displaced external rotation-abduction fractures of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg. September 1985;67A(7):1066-1074.|
|1976||Ramsey PL, Hamilton W. Changes in tibiotalar area of contact caused by lateral talar shift. J Bone Joint Surg. April 1976;58A(3):356-357.|
|1956||Close JR. Some applications of the functional anatomy of the ankle joint. J Bone Joint Surg. July 1956;38A(4):761-781.|
|1991||Boytim MJ, Fischer DA, Neumann L. Syndesmotic ankle sprains. Am J Sports Med. 1991;19(3):294-298.|
|1990||Stiehl JB. Complex ankle fracture dislocations with syndesmotic diastasis. Orthop Rev. June 1990;19(6):499-507.|
|1989||Needleman RL, Skrade DA, Stiehl JB. Effect of the syndesmotic screw on ankle motion. Foot Ankle. August 1989;10(1):17-24.|
|2003||Beumer A, Valstar E, Garling E, Niesing R, Ranstam J, Löfvenberg R, Swierstra B. Kinematics of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis: radiostereometry in 11 normal ankles. Acta Orthop Scand. June 2003;74(3):337-343.|
|2011||Schepers T. To retain or remove the syndesmotic screw: a review of literature. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. July 2011;131(7):879-883.|
|2011||DeGroot H, Al-Omari AA, El Ghazaly SA. Outcomes of suture button repair of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. Foot Ankle Int. March 2011;32(2):250-256.|
|2011||Qamar F, Kadakia A, Venkateswaran B. An anatomical way of treating ankle syndesmotic injuries. J Foot Ankle Surg. November–December 2011;50(6):762-765.|
|2011||Mulligan EP. Evaluation and management of ankle syndesmosis injuries. Phys Ther Sport. May 2011;12(2):57-69.|