Discrete and continuous joint coupling relationships in uninjured recreational runners

Dierks, Tracy A.; Davis, Irene

Affiliations

¹Department of Physical Therapy, Indiana University, 1140 W. Michigan Street, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA

²Department of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, 326 McKinly Lab, Newark, DE 19716, USA

³Drayer Physical Therapy Institute, Hummelstown, PA 17036, USA

Abstract and keywords

Background: Abnormal joint coupling is thought to be related to overuse injuries in runners. However, researchers do not yet know what constitutes normal joint coupling during running, which makes abnormal coupling difficult to define.

Methods: Lower extremity kinematics were collected from 40 recreational runners during stance. Joint coupling methods were applied and, for each method, means and both within- and between-subject variability were calculated. The 95% confidence interval was used to compare differences across coupling relationships and periods of stance.

Findings: Timing between rearfoot eversion, tibial internal rotation, and knee flexion were relatively synchronous while relationships involving knee internal rotation were more asynchronous. The excursion ratios showed that every 2° of rearfoot eversion was coupled with 1° of both tibial internal rotation and knee internal rotation. Vector coding results showed that just beyond maximum loading, all joint coupling relationships resulted in relatively equal amounts of motion, while the within-subject variability was similar throughout stance. The continuous relative phase results showed that the most out-of-phase coupling occurred in the periods around heel-strike and toe-off while the most in-phase coupling occurred in the period just beyond maximum loading of the leg. The continuous relative phase within-subject variability was greatest at the periods around heel-strike and toe-off and smallest just beyond maximum loading.

Interpretation: With a better understanding of joint coupling in uninjured runners, these data will help to serve as a reference for future studies investigating the relationship between running injuries and abnormal joint coupling.

Keywords: Continuous relative phase; Excursion ratio; Running; Timing difference; Variability; Vector coding

Links

DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.01.012

PubMed: 17367903

WoS: 000246954300014

History

Received: 2004-11-19

Accepted: 2007-01-26

Online: 2007-03-28

Cited Works (8)

Year	Entry
1993	Nigg BM, Cole GK, Nachbauer W. Effects of arch height of the foot on angular motion of the lower extremities in running. J Biomech. August 1993;26(8):909-916.
1999	Hamill J, van Emmerik REA, Heiderscheit BC, Li L. A dynamical systems approach to lower extremity running injuries. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). June 1999;14(5):297-308.
2000	Stacoff A, Nigg BM, Reinschmidt C, van den Bogert AJ, Lundberg A, Stüssi E, Denoth J. Movement coupling at the ankle during the stance phase of running. Foot Ankle Int. 2000;21(3):232-239.
1983	Grood ES, Suntay WJ. A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee. J Biomech Eng. May 1983;105(2):136-144.
1987	Tiberio D. The effect of excessive subtalar joint pronation on patellofemoral mechanics: a theoretical model. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1987;9(4):160-165.
1997	McClay I, Manal K. Coupling parameters in runners with normal and excessive pronation. J Appl Biomech. May 1997;13(1):109-124.
2001	Williams DS III, McClay IS, Hamill J. Arch structure and injury patterns in runners. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). May 2001;16(4):341-347.
2000	Stacoff A, Nigg BM, Reinschmidt C, van den Bogert AJ, Lundberg A. Tibiocalcaneal kinematics of barefoot versus shod running. J Biomech. 2000;33(11):1387-1395.

Cited By (2)

Year	Entry
2008	Orendurff MS, Rohr ES, Segal AD, Medley JW, Green JR III, Kadel NJ. Regional foot pressure during running, cutting, jumping, and landing. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36(3):566-571.
2010	Dierks TA, Davis IS, Hamill J. The effects of running in an exerted state on lower extremity kinematics and joint timing. J Biomech. November 16, 2010;43(15):2993-2998.