wbldb
home
|
authors
|
theses
Adam, David
Citation analysis: the counting house
Nature
. February 14, 2002;415(6873):726-729
Links
DOI:
10.1038/415726a
WoS:
000173833900012
Cited Works (1)
Year
Entry
1997
Seglen PO. Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research.
BMJ
. 1997;314(7079):498-502.
Cited By (6)
Year
Entry
2004
Kaltenborn K-F, Kuhn K. The journal impact factor as a parameter for the evaluation of researchers and research.
Rev Esp Enf Dig
(Madrid). July 2004;96(7):460-476.
2013
Lievers WB. Manuscript processing times are negatively correlated with journal impact factors.
Can J Inform Lib Sci
. December 2013;37(4):225-236.
2004
Pudovkin AI, Garfield E. Rank-normalized impact factor: a way to compare journal performance across subject categories.
Proc Am Soc Info Sci Technol
. 2004;41(1):507-515.
2003
Tobin MJ. Impact factor and the journal.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
. 2003;168(6):621-622.
2008
Wilcox AJ. Rise and fall of the Thomson impact factor.
Epidemiology
. 2008;19(3):373-374.
2002
Jiménez-Contreras E, López-Cózar ED, Ruiz-Pérez R, Fernández VM. Impact-factor rewards affect Spanish research.
Nature
. June 27, 2002;417(6892):898.