Rear-Facing Child Restraint Device Performance in Side Impact Crashes

Links

URL: http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1793/65873

Abstract

The purpose of this research project was to examine the performance of rear-facing child restraint devices (RFCRD) involved in side impact crashes. Side impact crashes are the second highest crash mode reported by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).

Child restraint devices (CRDs) are being installed in the center seating position of vehicles because it is thought to be the safest position in the vehicle due to the distance from any intrusion. Children are still being injured in side impact crashes due to the child restraint device moving toward the direction of impact and colliding against the intruding sheetmetal and interior components of a vehicle hit in the side. Testing done by the NHTSA in the Side Impact New Car Assessment Program (SINCAP) in 2007 placed RFCRDs in test vehicles. Subjective analysis of the SINCAP high speed video raised the question examined in this research about the excursions and potential injury of the child occupants in side impacts.

The first part of this study examined the maximum head excursion of a 12 month CRABI anthropomorphic test device (ATD) placed in RFCRDs at a change in velocity of 35 km/h (22mph). The change in velocity was determined by using the average of four popular selling small and mid-size vehicles' crash tested by the NHTSA SINCAP program. The purpose of the test series was to determine if a child occupant placed in a CRD in the center seating position would impact the door of a vehicle involved in a higher speed side impact event, such as the NHTSA SINCAP program where a moving deformable barrier traveling at 62 km/h (38.5 mph) impacts the side of a vehicle.

After determining the excursion of the ATD head, and determining if the head would hit an intruding door during a side impact event, the ATD and CRD were impacted into a simulated door to determine injury potential at 35 km/h (22 mph) change in velocity. Tests impacting the simulated door were also conducted at 29 km/h (18 mph), and 24 km/h (15 mph) to determine injury potential.

In all the sled tests done at 35 km/h (22 mph) the ATD head moved into the crush zone of a sample of smaller and mid-sized vehicles. The potential for severe head injury using all the tested RFCRDs at 35 km/h (22mph) was high when impacting a simulated door. The threshold for lower injury potential was at 24 km/h (15 mph). When the ATD did not impact anything at 35km/h (22 mph) the potential for severe head injury was also low.

This study concludes that testing of CRDs needs to be done at higher speeds to better protect children involved in higher speed side impact crashes. Head injury values and excursions both need to be evaluated for reducing injury potential.

Cited Works (14)

Year	Entry
2004	Charlton JL, Fildes B, Laemmle R, Smith S, Douglas F. A preliminary evaluation of child restraints and anchorage systems for an Australian car. In: 48th Annual Proceedings, Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine (AAAM). September 13-15, 2004; Key Biscayne, FL.73-86.
1997	Brown J, Kelly P, Griffiths M. A comparison of alternative anchorage systems for child restraints in side impacts. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Child Occupant Protection Symposium. November 12, 1997; Orlando, FL.87-92. SAE 973303.
1998	Braver ER, Whitfield R, Ferguson SA. Seating positions and children’s risk of dying in motor vehicle crashes. Inj Prev. 1998;4(3):181-187.
2005	Klinich KD, Ritchie NL, Manary MA, Reed MP, Tamborra N, Schneider LW. Kinematics of the Q3S ATD in a child restraint under far-side impact loading. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV). June 6-9, 2005; Washington, DC.
1994	Langwieder K, Hummel T. Biomechanical risk factors for children in cars and aggravation by misuse of restraint systems. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV). May 23-26, 1994; Munich, Germany.1584-1597.
2009	Ghati Y, Menon RA, Milone M, Lankarani H, Oliveres G. Performance evaluation of child safety seats in far-side lateral sled. In: 53rd Annual Proceedings, Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine (AAAM). October 5-7, 2009; Baltimore, MD.221-235.
2001	Paine M, Vertsonis H. Surveys of child restraint use in New South Wales. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV). June 4-7, 2001; Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
2000	Arbogast KB, Moll EK, Morris SD, Anderko RL, Durbin DR, Winston FK. Factors influencing pediatric injury in side impact collisions. In: 44th Annual Proceedings, Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine (AAAM). October 2-4, 2000; Chicago, IL.
2009	Sullivan LK, Louden AE. NHTSA’s initial evaluation of child side impact test procedures. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV). June 15-18, 2009; Stuttgart, Germany.
2004	Howard A, Rothman L, McKeag AM, Pazmino-Canizares J, Monk B, Comeau JL, Mills D, Blazeski SB, Hale I, German A. Children in side-impact motor vehicle crashes: seating positions and injury mechanisms. J Trauma. June 2004;56(6):1276-1285.
2011	Sullivan LK, Louden AE, Echemendia CG. NHTSA's evaluation of a potential child side impact test procedure. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV). June 13-16, 2011; Washington, DC.
2007	Henary B, Sherwood CP, Crandall JR, Kent RW, Vaca FE, Arbogast KB, Bull MJ. Car safety seats for children: rear facing for best protection. Inj Prev. 2007;13(6):398-.
2007	Brown J, Paine M, Paine D, Kelly P, Griffiths M, Magadera N, Haley J, Case M. Revised assessment protocols and scoring methods for the Australian child restraint evaluation program. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV). June 18-21, 2007; Lyon, France.
1999	Eppinger R, Sun E, Bandak F, Haffner M, Khaewpong N, Maltese M, Kuppa S, Nguyen T, Takhounts E, Tannous R, Zhang A, Saul R. Development of Improved Injury Criteria for the Assessment of Advanced Automotive Restraint Systems - II. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA); November 1999.