Pedestrian protection:​ an evaluation of an airbag system through modelling and testing

Holding, P. N.; Chinn, B. P.; Happian-Smith, J.

Affiliations

Abstract

Pedestrian impacts currently account for over 900 deaths and over 40,000 casualties each year in Britain. The chance of death or serious long-term disability increases greatly with impact speed. At 20mile/h (32km/h) the probability of killing or seriously injuring a child is 20%, but this rises to 80% at 40mile/h (64 km/h).

Advanced Active Adaptive Secondary Safety systems were studied, which comprised sensors to identify a pedestrian within the vicinity of a vehicle and determine the likelihood of an impact and airbags fitted to various parts of the vehicle front to protect the pedestrian in an impact. The research comprised modelling in MADYMO followed by impact testing. Sensor systems were investigated in parallel.

Impacts between a 50th percentile adult dummy and a saloon car and a Sports Utility Vehicle (SUV) were simulated in MADYMO at two impact velocities; 25mile/h (40km/h) and 30mile/h (48km/h). The vehicle models were modified, where possible, to ensure likely compliance with the proposed EEVC pedestrian protection limits. These models and the resulting potential injuries were used as the basis for comparison with the active systems. The simulation results for active systems showed that the potential for injury reduction was substantial. For example HIC was reduced from 1062 to 113 in an impact of 25mile/h (40km/h) with the saloon car. These results were used to select the system for experimental tests.

Testing consisted of impacts to an instrumented adult OPAT dummy and a child OPAT dummy with vehicles and conditions similar to those modelled and at the same velocities. Injury potential from the impacts was assessed. Results were similar to the simulation predictions and showed that a substantial reduction in lower limb and head injury may be possible with airbags mounted on the bumper and the bonnet. The paper describes the research including a brief resume of the sensor development.

Links

URL: http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/pdf/nrd-01/Esv/esv17/Proceed/00187.pdf

Cited Works (1)

Year	Entry
1985	Hobbs CA, Lawrence GJL, Clarke CS. PSC1: a demonstration car with improvements for pedestrian protection. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Technical Conference on Experimental Safety Vehicles (ESV). July 1-4, 1985; Oxford, England.31-38. SAE 856011.

Cited By (6)

Year	Entry
2001	Holding PN, Chinn BP, Happian-Smith J. An evaluation of the benefits of active restraint systems in frontal impacts through computer modelling and dynamic testing. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV). June 4-7, 2001; Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
2003	Ishikawa T, Kore H, Furumoto A, Kuroda S. Evaluation of pedestrian protection structures using impactors and full-scale dummy tests. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV). May 19-22, 2003; Nagoya, Japan.
2005	McCarthy M, Simmons I. Active pedestrian protection. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV). June 6-9, 2005; Washington, DC.
2005	Pack R, Koopmann J, Yu H, Najm WG. Pre-crash sensing countermeasures and benefits. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV). June 6-9, 2005; Washington, DC.
2017	Thomas A. Comparison of computer humanoid simulation and practical forensic pedestrian dummy testing. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV). June 5-8, 2017; Detroit, MI.
2004	Fildes B, Gabler HC, Otte D, Linder A, Sparke L. Pedestrian impact priorities using real-world crash data and harm. In: Proceedings of the 2004 International IRCOBI Conference on the Biomechanics of Impact. September 22-24, 2004; Graz, Austria.167-177.